The impact of the antenna phase center models on the coordinates in the EUREF Permanent Network

被引:1
作者
Andrzej Araszkiewicz
Christof Völksen
机构
[1] Military University of Technology,Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy
[2] Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities,Commission for Geodesy and Glaciology
来源
GPS Solutions | 2017年 / 21卷
关键词
GPS; Network analysis; Antenna phase center; Antenna calibration models; Time series; EPN Repro2;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Precise positioning using the signals of the Global Position System requires correcting the distance between the points of reception of the signal carrier phase and the antenna reference point. Sophisticated models to account for these phase errors are available and widely in use. These models are usually based on calibrations of several antennas of the same type to derive a mean model. There is also the possibility of applying individual correction models that are derived for one single antenna, since the individual antennas may still vary by a few millimeters. We prepared two sets of station position time series to understand the impact of using type mean or individual antenna correction models. At first, we estimated the station positions using the type mean model for the antenna corrections as it is provided by the IGS. Second, the same processing strategy was used, but this time with individual antenna correction models provided they were available. Then, based on these two solutions, we evaluated how different antenna corrections impact the network alignment and subsequently station coordinates. We showed that mixing two sources of antenna phase center corrections may influence the reference frame realization. However, this impact is very small and can be reduced by an appropriate selection of reference stations. Finally, we demonstrated that for some antennas, the application of type mean or individual antenna calibration models may cause a discrepancy in the position of over 10 mm for the horizontal and vertical component. However, for most of the antennas these offsets are below 2 mm for horizontal components and below 4 mm for vertical component. Thereby, for common antennas we confirmed the results obtained by others.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 757
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Baire Q(2014)Influence of different GPS receiver antenna calibration models on geodetic positioning GPS Solut 18 529-539
[2]  
Pottiaux E(2006)Troposphere mapping functions for GPS and very long baseline interferometry from European centre for medium-range weather forecasts operational analysis data J Geophys Res Solid Earth 136 27-35
[3]  
Bruyninx C(2012)Enhancement of the EUREF Permanent Network services and products Geodesy Planet Earth IAG Symp Ser 107 2075-145
[4]  
Defraigne P(2002)Anatomy of apparent seasonal variations from GPS-derived site position time series J Geophys Res 10 136-30
[5]  
Aerts W(2006)Absolute calibration of GPS antennas: laboratory results and comparison with field and robot techniques GPS Solut 53 23-199
[6]  
Legrand J(2001)Calibration of antenna-radome and monument-multipath effect of GEONET—Part 2: evaluation of the phase map by GEONET data Earth Planets Space 7 194-58
[7]  
Bergeot N(2003)MATLAB tools for viewing GPS velocities and time series GPS Solut 3 50-60
[8]  
Chevalier JM(1999)GPS antenna calibration at the National Geodetic Survey GPS Solut 115 B03417-295
[9]  
Boehm J(2005)10th Generation International geomagnetic reference field EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 4 55-56
[10]  
Werl B(2010)Higher-order ionospheric effects on the GPS reference frame and velocities J Geophys Res Soli Earth 41 277-undefined