The ‘Great Divide’: How the Arts Contribute to Science and Science Education

被引:0
作者
Martin Braund
Michael J. Reiss
机构
[1] Cape Peninsula University of Technology,Department of Research, Faculty of Education
[2] University College London,UCL Institute of Education
来源
Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education | 2019年 / 19卷
关键词
Curriculum; Policy development; Science-arts collaboration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, there has been a rapid growth in interest about the relationship between the arts and the sciences. This article explores this developing relationship and the suggestion that science and science learning are not complete without the arts. We see three levels at which the arts might improve the teaching and learning of science. The first is at a macro-level, concerned with ways in which subjects (including the arts and sciences) are structured and options for studying them provided and packaged. The second is at the meso-level, guiding approaches constructing science curricula that engage learners through using STS (Science, Technology and Society) contexts. The third is at the micro-level, of pedagogical practices in science and teaching that can be drawn from the arts. The drivers of STEAM (Science, Technology, Arts, Engineering and Mathematics) add new dimensions to the nature of science in the twenty-first century and make science likely to diverge even more rapidly from school science unless new pedagogies, including those from the arts, help close the gap. The result could be a more authentic and engaging school science, one more relevant to the needs of the twenty-first century.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 236
页数:17
相关论文
共 75 条
[11]  
Breimer J(2011)Concept development and transfer in context-based science education International Journal of Science Education 33 817-837
[12]  
Johnson C(2004)Introducing molecular visualization to primary schools in California: The STart! teaching Science Through Art program Journal of Chemical Education 81 1431-1436
[13]  
Harkness S(2018)Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study Journal of Educational Change. 9 153-179
[14]  
Koehler C(1976)The age of the world view Boundary 2 341-355
[15]  
Clarke I(2016)Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: implications for teacher educators Professional Development in Education 43 416-438
[16]  
Craft A(1991)Practical work in science: time for a reappraisal Studies in Science Education 19 175-184
[17]  
Cross ES(2012)The play was always the thing: Drama’s effect on brain function Psychology 3 454-456
[18]  
Ticini LF(1999)A developmental model of critical thinking Educational Researcher 28 16-26
[19]  
Crowther G(2008)Revisioning science “Love and passion in the scientific imagination”: Art and science International Journal of Science Education 30 793-805
[20]  
Dillon P(2008)Let’s fight for inquiry science! Science and Children 45 36-38