The ‘Great Divide’: How the Arts Contribute to Science and Science Education

被引:0
作者
Martin Braund
Michael J. Reiss
机构
[1] Cape Peninsula University of Technology,Department of Research, Faculty of Education
[2] University College London,UCL Institute of Education
来源
Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education | 2019年 / 19卷
关键词
Curriculum; Policy development; Science-arts collaboration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, there has been a rapid growth in interest about the relationship between the arts and the sciences. This article explores this developing relationship and the suggestion that science and science learning are not complete without the arts. We see three levels at which the arts might improve the teaching and learning of science. The first is at a macro-level, concerned with ways in which subjects (including the arts and sciences) are structured and options for studying them provided and packaged. The second is at the meso-level, guiding approaches constructing science curricula that engage learners through using STS (Science, Technology and Society) contexts. The third is at the micro-level, of pedagogical practices in science and teaching that can be drawn from the arts. The drivers of STEAM (Science, Technology, Arts, Engineering and Mathematics) add new dimensions to the nature of science in the twenty-first century and make science likely to diverge even more rapidly from school science unless new pedagogies, including those from the arts, help close the gap. The result could be a more authentic and engaging school science, one more relevant to the needs of the twenty-first century.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 236
页数:17
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Abd-El-Khalick F(2002)Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Towards valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of the nature of science Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 497-521
[2]  
Lederman NG(2005)Representing science through historical drama: Lord Kelvin and the age of the Earth debate Science & Education 14 457-471
[3]  
Bell RL(1994)Implications of postmodernism for science, or, science as progressive discourse Educational Psychologist 29 3-12
[4]  
Schwartz RS(2003)Opportunities to talk science in high school chemistry classrooms Research in Science Education 33 319-339
[5]  
Begoray D(2012)What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships School Science and Mathematics 112 3-11
[6]  
Stinner A(2014)How to manage a revolution: Isaac Newton in the early twentieth century Notes & Records 68 323-337
[7]  
Bereiter C(2010)The limits to creativity in education: dilemmas for the educator British Journal of Educational Studies 51 113-127
[8]  
Bleicher R(2012)Neuroaesthetics and beyond: New horizons in applying the science of the brain to the art of dance Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 5-16
[9]  
Tobin K(2012)Using science songs to enhance learning: An interdisciplinary approach CBE Life Sciences Education 11 26-30
[10]  
McRobbie CD(2008)A pedagogy of connection and boundary crossings: methodological and epistemological transactions in working across and between disciplines Innovations in Education and Teaching International 45 255-262