Prognostic impact of disseminated intravascular coagulation score in acute heart failure patients referred to a cardiac intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
作者
Ryosuke Itani
Yuichiro Minami
Shintaro Haruki
Erisa Watanabe
Nobuhisa Hagiwara
机构
[1] Tokyo Women’s Medical University,Department of Cardiology
来源
Heart and Vessels | 2017年 / 32卷
关键词
Acute heart failure; Disseminated intravascular coagulation; Intensive care; Outcome; Risk stratification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Thrombosis within the vascular system in relation to inflammation and stasis is potentially associated with poor prognosis in patients with heart failure. The aim of this study was to clarify the association between disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) score, a scoring system for microvascular thrombosis and multiple organ dysfunction, and outcome in hospitalized patients with acute heart failure (AHF). We retrospectively evaluated 160 AHF patients referred to a cardiac intensive care unit who had their DIC score measured according to the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) DIC scoring system on admission. Platelet count, prothrombin time ratio, fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products, and the criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome were measured. Using the JAAM DIC score, the prevalence of DIC (score ≥4) in AHF patients was 5.0% (8 of 160 patients). The risk of death for patients grouped according to the DIC score was 27.8%, 46.2%, and 87.5% for DIC scores 0–1, 2–3, and ≥4, respectively (median follow-up 460 days). In multivariate analysis adjusted for various markers of disease severity, a DIC score ≥2 was independently associated with a higher all-cause death rate (adjusted hazard ratio 2.45; P = 0.005) and a higher rate of reaching the combined endpoint of all-cause death and readmission for AHF (adjusted hazard ratio 2.10; P = 0.006) after admission for AHF. In an intensive care setting, measurement of DIC score on admission could help risk stratification in hospitalized patients with AHF.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 879
页数:7
相关论文
共 244 条
[1]  
McMurray JJ(2012)ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC Eur Heart J 33 1787-1847
[2]  
Adamopoulos S(2013)2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines J Am Coll Cardiol 62 e147-e239
[3]  
Anker SD(2016)Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 58% have fewer incidences of future acute decompensated heart failure admission and all-cause mortality Heart Vessels 31 734-743
[4]  
Auricchio A(2016)The predictability of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system factors for clinical outcome in patients with acute decompensated heart failure Heart Vessels 31 925-931
[5]  
Bohm M(2016)Impact of onset time of acute kidney injury on outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure Heart Vessels 31 60-65
[6]  
Dickstein K(2013)Is thrombosis a contributor to heart failure pathophysiology? Possible mechanisms, therapeutic opportunities, and clinical investigation challenges Int J Cardiol 167 1772-1782
[7]  
Falk V(1999)Does heart failure confer a hypercoagulable state? Virchow’s triad revisited J Am Coll Cardiol 33 1424-1426
[8]  
Filippatos G(2013)A multicenter, prospective validation study of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring system in patients with severe sepsis Crit Care 17 R111-320
[9]  
Fonseca C(2006)New disseminated intravascular coagulation score: a useful tool to predict mortality in comparison with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Logistic Organ Dysfunction scores Crit Care Med 34 314-631
[10]  
Gomez-Sanchez MA(2006)A multicenter, prospective validation of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria for critically ill patients: comparing current criteria Crit Care Med 34 625-150