Stem cell implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head

被引:0
作者
Young Wook Lim
Yong Sik Kim
Jong Wook Lee
Soon Yong Kwon
机构
[1] Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[2] College of Medicine,Department of Hematology
[3] The Catholic University of Korea,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[4] Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital,undefined
[5] College of Medicine,undefined
[6] The Catholic University of Korea,undefined
[7] Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital,undefined
[8] College of Medicine,undefined
[9] The Catholic University of Korea,undefined
来源
Experimental & Molecular Medicine | 2013年 / 45卷
关键词
core decompression; osteonecrosis; stem cell implantation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
What is the most effective treatment for the early stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head? We assessed multiple drilling and stem cell implantation to treat the early stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. We report the clinical and radiological results of stem cell implantation and core decompression. In total, 128 patients (190 hips) who had undergone surgery were divided into two groups based on which treatment they had received: (1) multiple drilling and stem cell implantation or (2) core decompression, curettage and a bone graft. The clinical and radiographic results of the two groups were compared. At 5-year follow-up, in the stem cell implantation group, 64.3% (27/42) of the patients with Stage IIa disease, 56.7% (21/37) of the patients with Stage IIb disease and 42.9% (21/49) of the patients with Stage III disease had undergone no additional surgery. In the conventional core decompression group, 64.3% (9/14) of the patients with Stage IIa disease, 55.6% (5/9) of the patients with Stage IIb disease and 37.5% (3/8) of the patients with Stage III disease had undergone no additional surgery. Success rates were higher in patients with Ficat Stage I or II lesions than in those with Stage III lesions. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of success rate or in the clinical and radiographic results of the two methods. Essentially the same results were found with stem cell implantation as with the conventional method of core decompression.
引用
收藏
页码:e61 / e61
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]  
Petrigliano FA(2007)Osteonecrosis of the hip: novel approaches to evaluation and treatment Clin Orthop Relat Res 465 53-62
[2]  
Lieberman JR(2006)Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: ten years later J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 1117-1132
[3]  
Mont MA(2004)Core decompression for osteonecrosis of the hip Clin Orthop Relat Res 418 29-33
[4]  
Jones LC(1998)Survival analysis of hips treated with core decompression or vascularized fibular grafting because of avascular necrosis J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 1270-1275
[5]  
Hungerford DS(1991)Autogeneic bone marrow and porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic for segmental bone defects in the canine ulna Clin Orthop Relat Res 266 244-258
[6]  
Lieberman JR(1998)The effect of implants loaded with autologous mesenchymal stem cells on the healing of canine segmental bone defects J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 985-996
[7]  
Scully SP(1996)Role of bone substitutes Clin Orthop Relat Res 324 55-65
[8]  
Aaron RK(1996)Porous ceramics as bone graft substitutes in long bone defects: a biomechanical, histological, and radiographic analysis J Orthop Res 14 351-369
[9]  
Urbaniak JR(1994)The effect of recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 on healing of large segmental bone defects J Bone Joint Surg Am 76 827-838
[10]  
Grundel RE(1993)Healing segmental femoral defects in sheep using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein Clin Orthop Relat Res 293 317-326