The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in pelvic organ prolapse

被引:0
作者
Vítor Cavadas
Frederico Branco
Filipe L. Carvalho
Luís Osório
Mário J. Gomes
Miguel Silva-Ramos
机构
[1] Centro Hospitalar do Porto,Department of Urology
[2] Centro Hospitalar do Porto,Serviço de Urologia
来源
International Urogynecology Journal | 2011年 / 22卷
关键词
CONSORT; Pelvic organ prolapse; Randomized controlled trials; Reporting quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:1117 / 1125
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Begg C(1996)Improving the quality of reporting for randomized controlled trials, the CONSORT statement JAMA 276 637-639
[2]  
Cho M(2001)The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration Ann Intern Med 134 663-694
[3]  
Eastwood S(2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials BMJ 4 CD004014-764
[4]  
Altman DG(2010)The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in Pubmed BMJ 20 763-1162
[5]  
Schulz KF(2010)Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women Cochrane Database Syst Rev 365 1159-249
[6]  
Moher D(2009)“Evidence-based medicine” to support the surgical procedures we perform on patients with pelvic organ prolapse Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 60 241-267
[7]  
Moher D(2005)Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals Lancet 185 263-128
[8]  
Hopewell S(2007)Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement J Clin Epidemiol 272 125-1095
[9]  
Schulz KF(2006)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review Med J Aust 177 1090-17
[10]  
Hopewell S(1994)Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals JAMA 175 10-1636