Physiological and behavioral responses to an electrical stimulus in Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus)

被引:0
作者
Jonathan A. C. Roques
Wout Abbink
Gaétan Chereau
Aurélie Fourneyron
Tom Spanings
Dirk Burggraaf
Ruud van de Bos
Hans van de Vis
Gert Flik
机构
[1] Institute for Water and Wetland Research,Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Science
[2] Radboud University Nijmegen,Department of Aquaculture
[3] IMARES Wageningen UR,Department of Animals in Science and Society, Division of Behavioural Neuroscience, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
[4] Institute for Marine Resources and Ecosystem Studies,undefined
[5] Utrecht University,undefined
来源
Fish Physiology and Biochemistry | 2012年 / 38卷
关键词
Mozambique tilapia; Nociception; Fish welfare; Tailfin electroshock; Behavior; Stress;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Consumer awareness of the need to improve fish welfare is increasing. Electrostunning is a clean and potentially efficient procedure more and more used to provoke loss of consciousness prior to killing or slaughtering (reviewed by Van de Vis et al. in Aquac Res 34:211–220, 2003). Little is known how (powerful) electrical stimuli, which do not stun immediately, are perceived by fish. We investigated responses of hand-held Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) to a standardized electric shock applied to the tailfin. The handling with the resulting unavoidable acute stress response was carefully controlled for. Fish responses were analyzed up to 24 h following the shock. Electric shock resulted in slightly higher levels in plasma cortisol, lactate, ionic levels, and osmolality, than handling alone. Plasma glucose had significantly increased 6 h after shock compared to handling, indicative of enhanced adrenergic activity. Mucus release from the gills, branchial Na+/K+ ATPase activity, and chloride cell migration and proliferation, parameters that will change with strong adrenergic activation, were not affected. Decreased swimming activity and delay in resumption of chafing behavior indicated a stronger and differential response toward the electric shock. Responses to handling lasted shorter compared to those to an electric shock. The differential and stronger responses to the electric shock suggest that fish perceived the shock potentially as painful.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1028
页数:9
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Apkarian AV(2005)Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease Eur J Pain 9 463-484
[2]  
Bushnell MC(1970)The problems of appeasement and of sexual roles in the courtship behaviour of the blackchin mouthbreeder, Behaviour 36 84-115
[3]  
Treede R-D(2004) (Pisces: Cichlidae) Anim Welf 13 S87-S92
[4]  
Zubieta J-K(2004)Fish and welfare: do fish have the capacity for pain perception and suffering? Appl Anim Behav Sci 86 225-250
[5]  
Barlow GW(1997)Can fish suffer? Perspectives on sentience, pain, fear and stress J Ichthyo 37 106-111
[6]  
Green RF(2000)Pain sensitivity and behaviour of fishes J Exp Biol 203 379-387
[7]  
Braithwaite VA(2009)Na ARBS Annu Rev Biomed Sci 11 1-20
[8]  
Huntingford FA(2008)/K Anim Welf 17 239-254
[9]  
Chandroo KP(1979)-ATPase immunoreactivity in branchial chloride cells of Pain 6 249-252
[10]  
Duncan IJH(1994) exposed to copper Pain Rev 1 172-183