The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life instrument: Reference data for users

被引:0
作者
Tracy Dixon
Lynette L.-Y. Lim
Neil B. Oldridge
机构
[1] Australian National University,National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health
[2] Indiana University Center for Aging Research,Schools of Allied Health and Medicine
[3] Regenstrief Institute for Health Care,undefined
来源
Quality of Life Research | 2002年 / 11卷
关键词
Health-related quality of life; Heart diseases; Minimal clinically important difference; Questionnaires; Reference values;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To report reference data for the heart-specific MacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life instrument. Methods: One thousand five hundred and six patients with myocardial infarction (n = 346), heart failure (n = 201), and ischaemic heart disease (IHD, n = 959) were surveyed 4 months after hospital discharge. Quality of life scores were determined, stratified by diagnostic category, age and sex. Changes in scores from 4 to 8 months post-discharge were calculated for a subset of 830 patients, stratified by age and sex. Results: At 4 months there were no significant differences in scores between myocardial infarction and electively admitted IHD patients, however the scores of heart failure patients were significantly lower (indicating poorer quality of life) than those of patients with other diagnoses. There were few significant differences between age groups or sexes when comparing within diagnostic groups. Change from 4 to 8 months was not associated with diagnosis, age, or sex but was associated with events within the period (readmission or revascularisation). The change data suggest that a value of 0.5 may be a useful indicator of the minimal clinically important difference. Conclusions: These reference data will assist in sample size calculations and with comparison of results in other studies, and will be of use to researchers who are using or intending to use the MacNew instrument.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 183
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Hillers TK(1994)Quality oflif e after myocardial infarction J Clin Epidemiol 47 1287-1296
[2]  
Guyatt GH(1993)A self-administered quality of life questionnaire after acute myocardial infarction J Clin Epidemiol 46 1249-1256
[3]  
Oldridge N(1996)An improved questionnaire for assessing quality of life after acute myocardial infarction Qual Life Res 5 151-161
[4]  
Lim LL-Y(1991)Effects on quality of life with comprehensive rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction Am J Cardiol 67 1084-1089
[5]  
Valenti LA(2000)Psychosocial experiences ofcardiac patients in early recovery: A community-based study J Adv Nurs 31 1368-1375
[6]  
Knapp JC(1998)Quality oflif e and later adverse health outcomes in patients with suspected heart attack A NZ J Public Health 22 540-546
[7]  
Valenti L(1995)Time course ofrecovery during cardiac rehabilitation J Cardiopulmonary Rehabil 15 209-215
[8]  
Lim L(1994)Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality oflif e questionnaire J Clin Epidemiol 47 81-87
[9]  
Heller RF(1997)Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals J Clin Epidemiol 50 1129-1136
[10]  
Knapp J.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined