The verification of wildland–urban interface fire evacuation models

被引:0
作者
E. Ronchi
J. Wahlqvist
A. Ardinge
A. Rohaert
S. M. V. Gwynne
G. Rein
H. Mitchell
N. Kalogeropoulos
M. Kinateder
N. Bénichou
E. Kuligowski
A. Kimball
机构
[1] Lund University,Department of Fire Safety Engineering
[2] Movement Strategies,undefined
[3] Imperial College London,undefined
[4] National Research Council,undefined
[5] Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology,undefined
[6] Fire Protection Research Foundation,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2023年 / 117卷
关键词
Wildfire; Evacuation; Egress; Verification; Simulation; Fire;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper introduces a protocol for the verification of multi-physics wildfire evacuation models, including a set of tests used to ensure that the conceptual modelling representation of each modelling layer is accurately implemented, as well as the interactions between different modelling layers and sub-models (wildfire spread, pedestrian movement, traffic evacuation, and trigger buffers). This work presents a total of 24 verification tests, including (1) 4 tests related to pedestrians, (2) 15 tests for traffic evacuation, (3) 5 tests concerning the interaction between different modelling layers, along with 5 tests for wildfire spread and trigger buffers. The evacuation tests are organized in accordance with different core components related to evacuation modelling, namely Population, Pre-evacuation, Movement, Route/destination selection, Flow constraints, Events, Wildfire spread and Trigger buffers. A reporting template has also been developed to facilitate the application of the verification testing protocol. An example application of the testing protocol has been performed using an open wildfire evacuation modelling platform called WUI-NITY and its associated trigger buffer model k-PERIL. The verification testing protocol is deemed to improve the credibility of wildfire evacuation model results and stimulate future modelling efforts in this domain.
引用
收藏
页码:1493 / 1519
页数:26
相关论文
共 129 条
[31]  
Gray R(2020)Developing and validating evacuation models for fire safety engineering Fire Saf J 20 04019002-undefined
[32]  
Regan DM(2014)Assessing the verification and validation of building fire evacuation models Fire Technol 71 138-undefined
[33]  
Gwynne SMV(2019)Alerts and warnings on short messaging channels: guidance from an expert panel process Nat Hazards Rev 31 1366-undefined
[34]  
Kuligowski E(2015)Microscopic driving theory with oscillatory congested states: model and empirical verification Transp Res B Methodol 102 178-undefined
[35]  
Spearpoint M(2018)Analysis of evacuation behavior in a wildfire event Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 136 105145-undefined
[36]  
Ronchi E(2018)The simulation of urban-scale evacuation scenarios with application to the Swinley forest fire Saf Sci 57 1041-undefined
[37]  
Haghani M(2021)The simulation of wildland-urban interface fire evacuation: the WUI-NITY platform Saf Sci 46 1069-undefined
[38]  
Kuligowski E(2021)Individual driving behaviour in wildfire smoke Fire Technol 2 105-undefined
[39]  
Rajabifard A(2003)One million dollars per mile? The opportunity costs of Hurricane evacuation Ocean Coast Manag 20 331-undefined
[40]  
Kolden CA(2001)“One-way-out”: contraflow freeway operation for hurricane evacuation Nat Hazards Rev 127 103051-undefined