The verification of wildland–urban interface fire evacuation models

被引:0
作者
E. Ronchi
J. Wahlqvist
A. Ardinge
A. Rohaert
S. M. V. Gwynne
G. Rein
H. Mitchell
N. Kalogeropoulos
M. Kinateder
N. Bénichou
E. Kuligowski
A. Kimball
机构
[1] Lund University,Department of Fire Safety Engineering
[2] Movement Strategies,undefined
[3] Imperial College London,undefined
[4] National Research Council,undefined
[5] Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology,undefined
[6] Fire Protection Research Foundation,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2023年 / 117卷
关键词
Wildfire; Evacuation; Egress; Verification; Simulation; Fire;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper introduces a protocol for the verification of multi-physics wildfire evacuation models, including a set of tests used to ensure that the conceptual modelling representation of each modelling layer is accurately implemented, as well as the interactions between different modelling layers and sub-models (wildfire spread, pedestrian movement, traffic evacuation, and trigger buffers). This work presents a total of 24 verification tests, including (1) 4 tests related to pedestrians, (2) 15 tests for traffic evacuation, (3) 5 tests concerning the interaction between different modelling layers, along with 5 tests for wildfire spread and trigger buffers. The evacuation tests are organized in accordance with different core components related to evacuation modelling, namely Population, Pre-evacuation, Movement, Route/destination selection, Flow constraints, Events, Wildfire spread and Trigger buffers. A reporting template has also been developed to facilitate the application of the verification testing protocol. An example application of the testing protocol has been performed using an open wildfire evacuation modelling platform called WUI-NITY and its associated trigger buffer model k-PERIL. The verification testing protocol is deemed to improve the credibility of wildfire evacuation model results and stimulate future modelling efforts in this domain.
引用
收藏
页码:1493 / 1519
页数:26
相关论文
共 129 条
  • [1] Akbarzadeh M(2015)Time-dependent route choice in hurricane evacuation Nat Hazard Rev 16 04014021-159
  • [2] Wilmot CG(2016)Simulation of wildfire evacuation with dynamic factors and model composition Simul Model Pract Theory 60 144-94
  • [3] Beloglazov A(2018)Surviving bushfire: the role of shelters and sheltering practices during the Black Saturday bushfires Environ Sci Policy 81 86-17
  • [4] Almashor M(2020)Simulation pipeline for traffic evacuation in urban areas and emergency traffic management policy improvements through case studies Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect 7 100210-468
  • [5] Abebe E(2014)Generic incident model for investigating traffic incident impacts on evacuation times in large-scale emergencies Transp Res Rec 2459 11-617
  • [6] Blanchi R(2016)The influence of memory on driving behavior: How route familiarity is related to speed choice. An on-road study Saf Sci 82 456-199
  • [7] Whittaker J(2005)Setting wildfire evacuation trigger points using fire spread modeling and GIS Trans GIS 9 603-125
  • [8] Haynes K(2007)WUIVAC: a wildland-urban interface evacuation trigger model applied in strategic wildfire scenarios Nat Hazards 41 181-417
  • [9] Chen Y(2014)Evacuation traffic dynamics Transp Res C Emerg Technol 49 114-352
  • [10] Shafi SY(2021)Awareness, departure, and preparation time in no-notice wildfire evacuations Saf Sci 139 105258-222