Who Gains Mental Health Benefits from Work Autonomy? The Roles of Gender and Occupational Class

被引:0
作者
Zhuofei Lu
Senhu Wang
Yaojun Li
Xiyuan Liu
Wendy Olsen
机构
[1] University of Manchester,Department of Social Statistics
[2] National University of Singapore,Department of Sociology
[3] University of Manchester,Department of Sociology and Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research
[4] University of Manchester,Department of Sociology
[5] University of Manchester,Department of Social Statistics and Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research
来源
Applied Research in Quality of Life | 2023年 / 18卷
关键词
Job quality; Mental health; Occupational statuses; Work autonomy; Workplace interventions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, improving work autonomy as an important priority in the UK labour market has been shown to enhance employee mental health and well-being. However, previous theories and empirical studies have paid little attention to the intersectional inequalities in the mental health benefits of work autonomy, preventing us from gaining a comprehensive understanding of the mental consequences of work autonomy. By integrating literature from occupational psychology, gender and social class, this study develops theoretical hypotheses regarding whether and how the mental health benefits of work autonomy vary alongside the intersectional axes of gender and occupational class and tests these hypotheses using long-term panel data in the UK (2010–2021). Overall, we find that those from higher occupational class and male employees acquire significantly more mental health benefits from high work autonomy compared with those from lower occupational class and female employees. Moreover, further analyses show significant intersectional inequalities of gender and occupational class. While male employees from all occupational classes gain significant mental health benefits from work autonomy, only female employees from higher (but not lower) occupational classes benefit from work autonomy. These findings contribute to the literature in the sociology of work by demonstrating the intersectional inequalities in mental health consequences of work autonomy, especially for women in the lower occupational class, highlighting the need for a more gender- and occupation-sensitive design in future labour market policies.
引用
收藏
页码:1761 / 1783
页数:22
相关论文
共 152 条
[41]  
Erikson R(2015)Gender differences in working at home and time use patterns: evidence from Australia Work, Employment and Society 47 242-988
[42]  
Goldthorpe JH(2004)Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism Gender and Society 74 966-444
[43]  
Glavin P(2013)A new model of social class? findings from the BBC’s Great British class survey experiment Sociology 66 422-250
[44]  
Schieman S(2006)The nature of work and the stress of higher status Journal of Health and Social Behavior 42 244-274
[45]  
Goldberg DP(2009)When work interferes with life: Work-nonwork interference and the influence of work-related demands and resources American Sociological Review 46 251-212
[46]  
Hillier VF(2011)Exploring the career pipeline: Gender differences in pre-career expectations Relations Industrielles 19 6809-151
[47]  
Grönlund A(2011)Worktime control-dependent reductions in fatigue, sleep problems, and depression Applied Ergonomics 111 141-328
[48]  
Hoven H(2022)Double jeopardy: The roles of job autonomy and spousal gender ideology in employed women’s mental health Applied Research in Quality of Life 1 125-234
[49]  
Wahrendorf M(2022)What matters more for employees’ mental health: Job quality or job quantity? Cambridge Journal of Economics 44 296-undefined
[50]  
Siegrist J(2022)Can Volunteering buffer the negative impacts of unemployment and economic inactivity on mental health? Longitudinal evidence from the United Kingdom International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 69 209-undefined