Who Gains Mental Health Benefits from Work Autonomy? The Roles of Gender and Occupational Class

被引:0
作者
Zhuofei Lu
Senhu Wang
Yaojun Li
Xiyuan Liu
Wendy Olsen
机构
[1] University of Manchester,Department of Social Statistics
[2] National University of Singapore,Department of Sociology
[3] University of Manchester,Department of Sociology and Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research
[4] University of Manchester,Department of Sociology
[5] University of Manchester,Department of Social Statistics and Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research
来源
Applied Research in Quality of Life | 2023年 / 18卷
关键词
Job quality; Mental health; Occupational statuses; Work autonomy; Workplace interventions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, improving work autonomy as an important priority in the UK labour market has been shown to enhance employee mental health and well-being. However, previous theories and empirical studies have paid little attention to the intersectional inequalities in the mental health benefits of work autonomy, preventing us from gaining a comprehensive understanding of the mental consequences of work autonomy. By integrating literature from occupational psychology, gender and social class, this study develops theoretical hypotheses regarding whether and how the mental health benefits of work autonomy vary alongside the intersectional axes of gender and occupational class and tests these hypotheses using long-term panel data in the UK (2010–2021). Overall, we find that those from higher occupational class and male employees acquire significantly more mental health benefits from high work autonomy compared with those from lower occupational class and female employees. Moreover, further analyses show significant intersectional inequalities of gender and occupational class. While male employees from all occupational classes gain significant mental health benefits from work autonomy, only female employees from higher (but not lower) occupational classes benefit from work autonomy. These findings contribute to the literature in the sociology of work by demonstrating the intersectional inequalities in mental health consequences of work autonomy, especially for women in the lower occupational class, highlighting the need for a more gender- and occupation-sensitive design in future labour market policies.
引用
收藏
页码:1761 / 1783
页数:22
相关论文
共 152 条
[21]  
van der Horst M(1979)A scaled version of the general health questionnaire Psychological Medicine 11 149-163
[22]  
Chung H(2007)More control, less conflict? Job demand-control, gender and work-family conflict Gender, Work and Organization 11 165-181
[23]  
van der Lippe T(2015)Occupational position, work stress and depressive symptoms: A pathway analysis of longitudinal SHARE data Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 52 99-116
[24]  
Clausen T(2008)Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility Community, Work and Family 34 430-462
[25]  
Pedersen LRM(2008)Exploring the relationship of workplace flexibility, gender, and life stage to family-to-work conflict, and stress and burnout Community, Work & Family 50 188-230
[26]  
Andersen MF(2009)Is participation good or bad for workers? Acta Sociologica 52 55-74
[27]  
Theorell T(2007)Work orientation and wives’ employment careers: An evaluation of Hakim’s preference theory Work and Occupations 24 285-211
[28]  
Madsen IEH(2018)Resource bargaining and gender display in housework and care work in modern china Chinese Sociological Review 14 204-443
[29]  
Cornwell B(2018)Who is doing the housework in multicultural Britain? Sociology (Oxford) 151 427-384
[30]  
Craig L(1979)Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign Administrative Science Quarterly 30 361-425