Who Gains Mental Health Benefits from Work Autonomy? The Roles of Gender and Occupational Class

被引:0
作者
Zhuofei Lu
Senhu Wang
Yaojun Li
Xiyuan Liu
Wendy Olsen
机构
[1] University of Manchester,Department of Social Statistics
[2] National University of Singapore,Department of Sociology
[3] University of Manchester,Department of Sociology and Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research
[4] University of Manchester,Department of Sociology
[5] University of Manchester,Department of Social Statistics and Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research
来源
Applied Research in Quality of Life | 2023年 / 18卷
关键词
Job quality; Mental health; Occupational statuses; Work autonomy; Workplace interventions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, improving work autonomy as an important priority in the UK labour market has been shown to enhance employee mental health and well-being. However, previous theories and empirical studies have paid little attention to the intersectional inequalities in the mental health benefits of work autonomy, preventing us from gaining a comprehensive understanding of the mental consequences of work autonomy. By integrating literature from occupational psychology, gender and social class, this study develops theoretical hypotheses regarding whether and how the mental health benefits of work autonomy vary alongside the intersectional axes of gender and occupational class and tests these hypotheses using long-term panel data in the UK (2010–2021). Overall, we find that those from higher occupational class and male employees acquire significantly more mental health benefits from high work autonomy compared with those from lower occupational class and female employees. Moreover, further analyses show significant intersectional inequalities of gender and occupational class. While male employees from all occupational classes gain significant mental health benefits from work autonomy, only female employees from higher (but not lower) occupational classes benefit from work autonomy. These findings contribute to the literature in the sociology of work by demonstrating the intersectional inequalities in mental health consequences of work autonomy, especially for women in the lower occupational class, highlighting the need for a more gender- and occupation-sensitive design in future labour market policies.
引用
收藏
页码:1761 / 1783
页数:22
相关论文
共 152 条
[1]  
Aryee S(1992)Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict among married professional women: Evidence from Singapore Human Relations (New York) 45 813-837
[2]  
Bathini DR(2019)An Orchestrated Negotiated Exchange: Trading Home-Based Telework for Intensified Work Journal of Business Ethics 154 411-423
[3]  
Kandathil GM(1995)Class analysis and class theory Sociology 29 453-473
[4]  
Breen R(2014)Overwork and the Slow Convergence in the Gender Gap in Wages American Sociological Review 79 457-484
[5]  
Rottman D(2007)Class and status: The conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance American Sociological Review 72 512-532
[6]  
Cha Y(2018)Re-employment, job quality, health and allostatic load biomarkers: Prospective evidence from the UK household longitudinal study International Journal of Epidemiology 47 47-57
[7]  
Weeden KA(2019)Are flexible work arrangements associated with lower levels of chronic stress-related biomarkers? A study of 6025 employees in the UK household longitudinal study Sociology 53 779-799
[8]  
Chan TW(2018)Gender, flexibility stigma and the perceived negative consequences of flexible working in the UK Social Indicators Research 151 521-545
[9]  
Goldthorpe JH(2022)The flexibility paradox The Flexibility Paradox 151 495-520
[10]  
Chandola T(2022)Flexible working and the division of housework and childcare: Examining divisions across arrangement and occupational lines Work, Employment and Society 151 365-381