Surrogate markers and survival in women receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer

被引:0
作者
A Hackshaw
A Knight
P Barrett-Lee
R Leonard
机构
[1] Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre,
[2] Stephenson House,undefined
[3] Evicom Ltd,undefined
[4] Velindre Hospital,undefined
[5] Singleton Hospital,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 2005年 / 93卷
关键词
breast cancer; survival; surrogate markers; metaregression;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Surrogate markers may help predict the effects of first-line treatment on survival. This metaregression analysis examines the relationship between several surrogate markers and survival in women with advanced breast cancer after receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (FAC) or 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) . From a systematic literature review, we identified 42 randomised trials. The surrogate markers were complete or partial tumour response, progressive disease and time to progression. The treatment effect on survival was quantified by the hazard ratio. The treatment effect on each surrogate marker was quantified by the odds ratio (or ratio of median time to progression). The relationship between survival and each surrogate marker was assessed by a weighted linear regression of the hazard ratio against the odds ratio. There was a significant linear association between survival and complete or partial tumour response (P<0.001, R2=34%), complete tumour response (P=0.02, R2=12%), progressive disease (P<0.001, R2=38%) and time to progression (P<0.0001, R2=56%); R2 is the proportion of the variability in the treatment effect on survival that is explained by the treatment effect on the surrogate marker. Time to progression may be a useful surrogate marker for predicting survival in women receiving first-line anthracycline chemotherapy and could be used to estimate the survival benefit in future trials of first-line chemotherapy compared to FAC or FEC. The other markers, tumour response and progressive disease, were less good.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1221
页数:6
相关论文
共 360 条
  • [31] Lopez JJ(1995) fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: final results of a randomized phase III multicenter trial Anticancer Res 15 495-501
  • [32] Bennett JM(1996)5-Fluorouracil, Adriamycin, Cyclophoshamide (FAC) Acta Oncol 35 57-200
  • [33] Muss HB(1995) 5-Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide (FEC) in Metastatic Breast Cancer J Infus Chemother 5 197-716
  • [34] Doroshow JH(1994)Adriamycin Eur J Cancer 30 715-776
  • [35] Wolff S(2000) methotrexate in five-drug combination chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer; a randomised trial Int J Oncol 16 769-266
  • [36] Krementz ET(2000)Prospective randomised trial of docetaxel J Clin Oncol 18 262-220
  • [37] Cartwright K(1983) mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy Breast Cancer Res Treat 3 209-127
  • [38] Dukart GD(1992)FEC (5-Fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) J Clin Oncol 10 117-1557
  • [39] Reisman A(1984) EM (epidoxorubicin and mitomycin-C) with or without lonidamine as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. A multicentric randomised study. Final results Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 19 1553-1905
  • [40] Schoch I(1997)Assessment of Estrogenic Recruitment before chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer: a double-blind randomized study J Clin Oncol 15 1897-239