Surrogate markers and survival in women receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer

被引:0
作者
A Hackshaw
A Knight
P Barrett-Lee
R Leonard
机构
[1] Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre,
[2] Stephenson House,undefined
[3] Evicom Ltd,undefined
[4] Velindre Hospital,undefined
[5] Singleton Hospital,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 2005年 / 93卷
关键词
breast cancer; survival; surrogate markers; metaregression;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Surrogate markers may help predict the effects of first-line treatment on survival. This metaregression analysis examines the relationship between several surrogate markers and survival in women with advanced breast cancer after receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (FAC) or 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) . From a systematic literature review, we identified 42 randomised trials. The surrogate markers were complete or partial tumour response, progressive disease and time to progression. The treatment effect on survival was quantified by the hazard ratio. The treatment effect on each surrogate marker was quantified by the odds ratio (or ratio of median time to progression). The relationship between survival and each surrogate marker was assessed by a weighted linear regression of the hazard ratio against the odds ratio. There was a significant linear association between survival and complete or partial tumour response (P<0.001, R2=34%), complete tumour response (P=0.02, R2=12%), progressive disease (P<0.001, R2=38%) and time to progression (P<0.0001, R2=56%); R2 is the proportion of the variability in the treatment effect on survival that is explained by the treatment effect on the surrogate marker. Time to progression may be a useful surrogate marker for predicting survival in women receiving first-line anthracycline chemotherapy and could be used to estimate the survival benefit in future trials of first-line chemotherapy compared to FAC or FEC. The other markers, tumour response and progressive disease, were less good.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1221
页数:6
相关论文
共 360 条
  • [21] Korzun A(2001) cyclophosphamide+doxorubicin plus fluorouracil as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer Oncol Rep 8 1067-1071
  • [22] Ginsberg S(1987)Treatment of metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women using CAF with or without oophorectomy: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study J Clin Oncol 5 354-364
  • [23] Holland JF(1987)Long-term survival of patients treated with combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer Cancer 60 2596-2604
  • [24] Alonso MC(2001)A randomized study of combination chemotherapy (VAC-FMC) with or without immunostimulation by Corynebacterium parvum in metastatic breast cancer J Clin Oncol 19 1707-1715
  • [25] Tabernero JM(1989)Is first-line single-agent mitoxantrone in the treatment of high-risk metastatic breast cancer patients as effective as combination chemotherapy? No difference in survival but higher quality of life were found in a multicenter randomized trial Oncology 46 1-5
  • [26] Ojeda B(1978)A randomized study comparing oral and standard regimens for metastatic breast cancer Cancer 42 2141-2148
  • [27] Llanos M(1999)Evaluation of high-dose J Clin Oncol 17 1413-1424
  • [28] Sola C(2000) standard FAC chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer in protected environment units: a prospective randomized study Eur J Cancer 36 966-975
  • [29] Climent MA(1993)Combined antiestrogen and cytotoxic therapy with pseudomonas vaccine immunotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. A prospective, randomized trial J Clin Oncol 11 1723-1728
  • [30] Segui MA(2003)Doxorubicin and paclitaxel J Clin Oncol 21 1819-1824