Surrogate markers and survival in women receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer

被引:0
作者
A Hackshaw
A Knight
P Barrett-Lee
R Leonard
机构
[1] Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre,
[2] Stephenson House,undefined
[3] Evicom Ltd,undefined
[4] Velindre Hospital,undefined
[5] Singleton Hospital,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 2005年 / 93卷
关键词
breast cancer; survival; surrogate markers; metaregression;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Surrogate markers may help predict the effects of first-line treatment on survival. This metaregression analysis examines the relationship between several surrogate markers and survival in women with advanced breast cancer after receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (FAC) or 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) . From a systematic literature review, we identified 42 randomised trials. The surrogate markers were complete or partial tumour response, progressive disease and time to progression. The treatment effect on survival was quantified by the hazard ratio. The treatment effect on each surrogate marker was quantified by the odds ratio (or ratio of median time to progression). The relationship between survival and each surrogate marker was assessed by a weighted linear regression of the hazard ratio against the odds ratio. There was a significant linear association between survival and complete or partial tumour response (P<0.001, R2=34%), complete tumour response (P=0.02, R2=12%), progressive disease (P<0.001, R2=38%) and time to progression (P<0.0001, R2=56%); R2 is the proportion of the variability in the treatment effect on survival that is explained by the treatment effect on the surrogate marker. Time to progression may be a useful surrogate marker for predicting survival in women receiving first-line anthracycline chemotherapy and could be used to estimate the survival benefit in future trials of first-line chemotherapy compared to FAC or FEC. The other markers, tumour response and progressive disease, were less good.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1221
页数:6
相关论文
共 360 条
  • [1] A'Hern RP(1988)Does chemotherapy improve survival in advanced breast cancer? A statistical overview Br J Cancer 57 615-618
  • [2] Ebbs SR(2001)Dose-intensive epirubicin-based chemotherapy is superior to an intensive intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil regimen in metastatic breast cancer: a randomized multinational study J Clin Oncol 19 943-953
  • [3] Baum MB(1987)Chemotherapy J Clin Oncol 5 1523-1533
  • [4] Ackland S(1995) chemoimmunotherapy (CAF v CAFVP v CMF each±MER) for metastatic carcinoma of the breast: a CALGB study Breast Cancer Res Treat 34 15-24
  • [5] Anton A(1988)A phase III randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5- fluorouracil (CNF) J Clin Oncol 6 1611-1620
  • [6] Breitbach GP(1985) cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer J Steroid Biochem 23 1123-1127
  • [7] Colajori E(1998)A randomized multicenter trial comparing mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil in the therapy of metastatic breast carcinoma Biometrics 54 1014-1029
  • [8] Tursi JM(2000)Chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with late breast cancer. A randomized study Biostatistics 1 49-67
  • [9] Delfino C(1996)Criteria for the validation of surrogate endpoints in randomised experiments Stat Medicine 15 2797-2812
  • [10] Efremidis A(2000)The validation of surrogate endpoints in meta-analyses of randomised experiments Lancet 356 373-378