Tour guides’ communication ecosystems: an inferential social network analysis approach

被引:0
作者
Ladan Ghahramani
Jalayer Khalilzadeh
Birendra KC
机构
[1] North Carolina State University,Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management
[2] Rosen College of Hospitality Management,Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management
[3] University of Central Florida,undefined
[4] University of North Texas,undefined
来源
Information Technology & Tourism | 2018年 / 20卷
关键词
Communication ecosystems; Social network analysis; Exponential random graph models (ERGM); Tour guides; World Federation of Tourist Guide Associations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Successful performance by tour guides depends highly on their networking activities and interpersonal skills. Membership in related associations can provide opportunities for establishing and expanding a supportive network in the tour guiding profession. This study explores communication ecosystems used among the members of the largest professional tour guides organization, the World Federation of Tourist Guide Associations (WFTGA). Using the data collected from the 17th WFTGA convention in Tehran, Iran, we investigated five types of tour guides’ communications ecosystems (i.e. in-person, online-call, text-message, e-mail, and social networks) and compared them to tour guides’ networks of colleagues (i.e., the network that shows how people know one another and how they are linked). Moreover, we included the complementary no-contact network to enhance the internal validity of the study. Using exponential random graph modeling, all seven networks have been modeled using demographic characteristics such as age, gender, education, marital status, and tenure along with the history of participation in previous WFTGA conventions and WFTGA membership status. The analyses of virtual/digital (i.e., online-call, text-message, e-mail, and online social networks) and natural/traditional (i.e., in-person) communication ecosystems showed interesting similarities and differences among the seven networks, providing valuable insights for practitioners as well as academicians. Findings revealed the formation of networks based on homophily as well as heterophily effects is a function of types of communication ecosystem.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 130
页数:27
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Altheide DL(1994)An ecology of communication: toward a mapping of the effective environment Sociol Q 35 665-683
[2]  
Ap J(2001)Case study on tour guiding: professionalism, issues and problems Tour Manag 22 551-563
[3]  
Wong KKF(2008)Symptoms of complexity in a tourism system Tour Anal 13 1-20
[4]  
Baggio R(2005)Quality assurance and regulatory mechanisms in the tour guiding industry: a systematic review J Tour Stud 16 24-37
[5]  
Black R(2000)Dusun Sade: local tourist guides, the provincial government and the (re)presentation of a traditional village in Central Lombok Pac Tour Rev 4 87-103
[6]  
Weiler B(1984)Network items and the general social survey Soc Netw 6 293-339
[7]  
Bras K(2009)Tour guide training in India: a comparison of approach and content with other programs J Teach Travel Tour 8 161-191
[8]  
Burt RS(2002)The politics of tour guiding: image management in Indonesia Ann Tour Res 29 783-800
[9]  
Chowdhary N(2014)The communicative ecology of web 2.0 at work: social networking in the workspace J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 65 2035-2047
[10]  
Prakash M(2007)Networked individualism of urban residents: discovering the communicative ecology in inner-city apartment buildings Inf Commun Soc 10 749-772