Form-finding and determining geodesic seam lines using the updated weight method for tensile membrane structures with strut and anchorage supports

被引:0
|
作者
Allan L. Marbaniang
Sounak Kabasi
Siddhartha Ghosh
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Technology Bombay,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] Indian Institute of Technology Bombay,Structural Safety, Risk & Reliability (SSRR) Lab, Department of Civil Engineering
来源
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | 2023年 / 66卷
关键词
Form-finding; Tensile membrane structures; Geodesic; Strut; Patterning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Tensile membrane structures (TMS) consist of the membrane fabric, supporting frame, cables and strut elements. The initial shape of a TMS is not known beforehand and has to be found by a process of ‘form-finding’. The majority of form-finding research has focused on determining the initial shape due to a defined prestress for TMS having only membrane and cable elements, while there has been very little research on TMS supported with struts and anchorage cables. This study extends the updated weight method (UWM) for the form-finding of TMS with struts and anchorage supports. The modified approach provides a robust solution in comparison to constrained strut length approaches. Furthermore, the curved form-found shape is not developable and geodesic lines need to be identified on the final form-found shape to provide seam locations for cutting the fabric. To solve this issue, geodesic lines are included in the UWM as constraints, whereby the geodesic pseudo cable lengths are minimised tangent to the surface. A sequential process is developed to ensure both the equilibrium and the constraint conditions are satisfied. The proposed method is successfully tested on a wide variety of TMS shapes along with the patterning of the cut panels. The study provides an integrated solution for the form-finding and identification of geodesic seam line on TMS having different boundary types.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Form-finding and determining geodesic seam lines using the updated weight method for tensile membrane structures with strut and anchorage supports
    Marbaniang, Allan L.
    Kabasi, Sounak
    Ghosh, Siddhartha
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2023, 66 (08)
  • [2] Form-finding of tensile membrane structures with strut and anchorage supports using physics-informed machine learning
    Kabasi, Sounak
    Marbaniang, Allan L.
    Ghosh, Siddhartha
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2024, 299
  • [3] Updated weight method: an optimisation-based form-finding method of tensile membrane structures
    Allan L. Marbaniang
    Subhrajit Dutta
    Siddhartha Ghosh
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2022, 65
  • [4] Updated weight method: an optimisation-based form-finding method of tensile membrane structures
    Marbaniang, Allan L.
    Dutta, Subhrajit
    Ghosh, Siddhartha
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 65 (06)
  • [5] Efficiency of dynamic relaxation methods in form-finding of tensile membrane structures
    Khatibinia, Mohsen
    Hosseinaei, Saeed
    Sarafrazi, Seyyed Reza
    SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 1 (11):
  • [6] Efficiency of dynamic relaxation methods in form-finding of tensile membrane structures
    Mohsen Khatibinia
    Saeed Hosseinaei
    Seyyed Reza Sarafrazi
    SN Applied Sciences, 2019, 1
  • [7] Form-finding of frame-supported tensile membrane structures using stochastic optimisation
    Dutta, Subhrajit
    Ghosh, Siddhartha
    STRUCTURES, 2021, 32 : 2211 - 2221
  • [8] A numerical form-finding method for the minimal surface of membrane structures
    Shimoda, M.
    Yamane, K.
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2015, 51 (02) : 333 - 345
  • [9] A numerical form-finding method for the minimal surface of membrane structures
    M. Shimoda
    K. Yamane
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 51 : 333 - 345
  • [10] The Modified Dynamic Relaxation Method for the Form-Finding of Membrane Structures
    Ye, Jihong
    Feng, Ruoqiang
    Zhou, Shulu
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2011, 4 (8-10) : 2845 - 2853