Comparison of the efficacy of Rose Bengal and erythrosin in photodynamic therapy against Enterobacteriaceae

被引:0
作者
Rodnei D. Rossoni
Juliana C. Junqueira
Evelyn Luzia S. Santos
Anna Carolina B. Costa
Antonio Olavo C. Jorge
机构
[1] São Paulo State University (UNESP),Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, School of Dentistry of São José dos Campos
来源
Lasers in Medical Science | 2010年 / 25卷
关键词
Photodynamic therapy; Light-emitting diode; Enterobacteriaceae; Rose Bengal; Erythrosin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the photosensitizers Rose Bengal and erythrosin combined with a light-emitting diode (LED) on Enterobacteriaceae. Twelve Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from the oral cavities of patients undergoing prolonged antibiotic therapy, including three Escherichia coli, three Enterobacter cloacae, three Klebsiella oxytoca and three Klebsiella pneumoniae, were studied. An Enterobacteriaceae suspension (106 cells/ml) was prepared from each clinical strain isolated from the human oral cavity and subjected to the following treatments: LED and Rose Bengal, LED and erythrosin, LED and physiological solution, and physiological solution only as control. A blue LED unit (460 nm), and Rose Bengal and erythrosin at a concentration of 50 µmol/l were used. After incubation at 37°C for 48 h, the number of colony-forming units (CFU) was calculated and subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Enterobacterial strains were sensitive to photodynamic therapy with Rose Bengal. There was a reduction of approximately 7.14 log10 for Enterobacter cloacae, 7.73 log10 for Escherichia coli, 6.76 log10 for Klebsiella pneumoniae and 7.21 log10 for Klebsiella oxytoca. However, photodynamic therapy using erythrosin did not reduce the numbers of CFUs per milliliter compared to the control group. The use of the LED alone had no toxic effect on the strain tested. The Enterobacteriaceae strains studied were sensitive to photodynamic therapy with Rose Bengal.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 586
页数:5
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Ackroyd R(2001)The history of photodetection and photodynamic therapy Photochem Photobiol 74 656-669
[2]  
Kelty C(2007)Photodynamic therapy in dentistry J Dent Res 86 694-707
[3]  
Brown N(1998)Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT) J Antimicrob Chemother 42 13-28
[4]  
Reed M(2004)Photosensitizing agents circumventing resistance and breaking down biofilms: a review Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 53 119-126
[5]  
Konopka K(2005)Photodynamic therapy for periodontal diseases: state of the art J Photochem Photobiol B 79 159-170
[6]  
Goslinski T(1985)The cytotoxic and photodynamic inactivation of micro-organisms by Rose Bengal J Appl Bacteriol 58 391-400
[7]  
Wainwright M(2000)Systematic study of parameters influencing the action of Rose Bengal with visible light on bacterial cells: comparison between the biological effect and singlet-oxygen production Photochem Photobiol 71 514-523
[8]  
Wainwright M(1988)Comparison of photodynamic action by Rose Bengal in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Photochem Photobiol 48 607-612
[9]  
Crossley KB(2009)Influence of gel color on in vitro surface and intrapulpal temperature rise during blue light-activated tooth bleaching Gen Dent 57 146-150
[10]  
Meisel P(1997)A 4-year longitudinal study of the oral prevalence of enteric Gram-negative rods and yeasts in Chinese children Oral Microbiol Immunol 12 183-188