Health-related quality of life and socioeconomic status of imprisoned middle-age and elderly persons

被引:0
作者
Kirill Kosilov
Irina Kuzina
Liliya Kosilova
Yuliya Gainullina
Vladimir Kuznetsov
Marina Ivanovskaya
Alexandra Prokofyeva
机构
[1] Far Eastern Federal University,Department of Social Sciences, School of Humanities
[2] Department of Public Health of the Pacific State Medical University,Department of Functional Diagnostics
[3] Med. Association No 2 of Vladivostok-sity,Department of Law
[4] Far Eastern Fisheries University,undefined
来源
Social Theory & Health | 2019年 / 17卷
关键词
Imprisoned; Health-related quality of life; Socioeconomic status; Elderly; Age-as-leveler;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of the article is to study the influence of socioeconomic statuses (SES) on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of persons imprisoned and preliminarily determine how applicable the “age-as-leveler” hypothesis and the “cumulative advantage/disadvantage” theory are to explaining this influence in the specific conditions of imprisonment. HRQoL among inmates is significantly lower than those in national populations. The influence of SES on HRQoL among inmates is described as insufficient. Over 2013–2016, 694 imprisoned men were studied. HRQoL estimation was conducted using the SF-6D questionnaire. In addition, marital status was studied, residence before imprisonment, as well as the Charlson comorbidity index. It was for the first time identified that the level of the HRQoL measures among persons imprisoned is affected by their level of education and marital status. The level of the effect of the inmate’s household income on HRQoL measures is less than in the population as a whole. The effect of SES on HRQoL among elderly persons in prison is unverifiable. With different values of the Charlson comorbidity index, a different level of HRQoL measures is noted regardless of age. A suggestion was voiced that under specific conditions of imprisonment, particularly, the hypothesis “age-as-leveler” more closely describes HRQoL measures, meanwhile “cumulative advantage/disadvantage” under the conditions of imprisonment possibly does not yield a significant effect. HRQoL of prisoners with higher education, family support, and high-quality medical care is higher than average among prisoners. Taking these factors into account, it would be useful to undertake a longitudinal study of HRQoL when changing parameters of SES.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 88
页数:13
相关论文
共 163 条
[1]  
Adler NE(2008)U.S. disparities in health: Descriptions, causes, and mechanisms Annual Review of Public Health 29 235-252
[2]  
Rehkopf DH(2016)Older prisoners: psychological distress and associations with mental health history, cognitive functioning, socio-demographic, and criminal justice factors International Psychogeriatry 28 385-395
[3]  
Baidawi S(2005)Estimating drug treatment needs among state prison inmates Drug Alcohol Dependence 77 269-281
[4]  
Belenko S(2014)Consideration of forgiveness to enhance the health status of older male prisoners confronting spiritual, social, or emotional vulnerability Journal of Applied Gerontology 33 998-1017
[5]  
Peugh J(2002)The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 Journal of Health Economics 21 271-292
[6]  
Bishop A(2014)Bruxism and health related quality of life in southern Italy’s prison inmates Community Dental Health 31 117-122
[7]  
Randall G(2016)Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20) SpringerPlus 5 381-135
[8]  
Merten M(2007)Unhealthy prisons: Exploring structural determinants of prison health Sociology Health Illness. 1 115-238
[9]  
Brazier J(2001)Social and health status of arrivals in a French prison: a consecutive case study from 1989 to 1995 Review Epidemiological Sante Publique 49 229-339
[10]  
Roberts J(2012)Public health and the epidemic of incarceration Annual Review of Public Health 33 325-15