The Steiner tree problem is a classical NP-hard optimization problem with a wide range of practical applications. In an instance of this problem, we are given an undirected graph G = (V, E), a set of terminals\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${R\subseteq V}$$\end{document} , and non-negative costs ce for all edges \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${e \in E}$$\end{document} . Any tree that contains all terminals is called a Steiner tree; the goal is to find a minimum-cost Steiner tree. The vertices \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${V \backslash R}$$\end{document} are called Steiner vertices. The best approximation algorithm known for the Steiner tree problem is a greedy algorithm due to Robins and Zelikovsky (SIAM J Discrete Math 19(1):122–134, 2005); it achieves a performance guarantee of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${1+\frac{\ln 3}{2}\approx 1.55}$$\end{document} . The best known linear programming (LP)-based algorithm, on the other hand, is due to Goemans and Bertsimas (Math Program 60:145–166, 1993) and achieves an approximation ratio of 2−2/|R|. In this paper we establish a link between greedy and LP-based approaches by showing that Robins and Zelikovsky’s algorithm can be viewed as an iterated primal-dual algorithm with respect to a novel LP relaxation. The LP used in the first iteration is stronger than the well-known bidirected cut relaxation. An instance is b-quasi-bipartite if each connected component of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${G \backslash R}$$\end{document} has at most b vertices. We show that Robins’ and Zelikovsky’s algorithm has an approximation ratio better than \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${1+\frac{\ln 3}{2}}$$\end{document} for such instances, and we prove that the integrality gap of our LP is between \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${\frac{8}{7}}$$\end{document} and \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${\frac{2b+1}{b+1}}$$\end{document} .
