How to improve statistical thinking: Choose the task representation wisely and learn by doing

被引:0
作者
Peter Sedlmeier
机构
[1] Universität-GH Paderborn,
[2] FB 2 – Psychologie,undefined
来源
Instructional Science | 2000年 / 28卷
关键词
training program; tutor system; statistical thinking; probabilities; representational format; learning by doing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Attempts to teach statistical thinking usingcorrective feedback or a “rule-training” approach havebeen only moderately successful. A new trainingapproach is proposed which relies on the assumptionthat the human mind is naturally equipped to solvemany statistical tasks in which the relevantinformation is presented in terms of absolutefrequencies instead of probabilities. In aninvestigation of this approach, people were trained tosolve tasks involving conjunctive and conditionalprobabilities using a frequency grid to representprobability information. It is suggested that learningby doing, whose importance was largely neglected inprior training studies, has played a major role in thecurrent training. Study 1 showed that training thatcombines external pictorial representations andlearning by doing has a large and lasting effect onhow well people can solve conjunctive probabilitytasks. A ceiling effect prevented comparison of thefrequency grid and a conventional pictorialrepresentation (Venn diagrams) with respect toeffectiveness. However, the grid representation wasfound to be more effective in Study 2, which dealtwith the more difficult topic of conditionalprobabilities. These results suggest methods tooptimize the teaching of statistical thinking and thepresentation of statistical information in themedia.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 262
页数:35
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Agnoli F.(1989)Suppressing natural heuristics by formal instruction: the case of the conjunction fallacy Cognitive Psychology 21 515-550
  • [2] Krantz D.H.(1995)ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition American Psychologist 51 355-365
  • [3] Anderson J.R.(1995)Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 167-207
  • [4] Anderson J.R.(1979)The theory of learning by doing Psychological Review 86 124-140
  • [5] Corbett A.T.(1982)Some teasers concerning conditional probabilities Cognition 11 109-122
  • [6] Koedinger K.(1993)The intractable conjunction fallacy: statistical sophistication, instructional set, and training Journal of Social Behavior & Personality 8 83-96
  • [7] Pelletier R.(1983)A curriculum to improve thinking under uncertainty Instructional Science 12 67-82
  • [8] Anzai Y.(1978)Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results New England Journal of Medicine 299 999-1000
  • [9] Simon H.A.(1990)Things I have learned (so far) American Psychologist 45 1304-1312
  • [10] Bar-Hillel M.(1992)A power primer Psychological Bulletin 112 155-159