A transperitoneal laparoscopic approach to endourology

被引:8
作者
Kaynan A.M. [1 ]
Winfield H.N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Urology, S-287, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Mail Code 5118, Stanford, 94305-5118, CA
关键词
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy; Fibrin Glue; Stress Urinary Incontinence; Transperitoneal Approach; Ureteral Calculus;
D O I
10.1007/s11934-001-0013-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although endoscopic methods have become the preferred means of management for many diseases facing the genitourinary surgeon, a laparoscopic approach might be considered comparable or advantageous in select circum-stances. In the literature, laparoscopists reporting their work have favored the transperitoneal approach; however, there are clear advantages and disadvantages to both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Intra-corporeal suturing remains the most time-consuming aspect of reconstructive surgery, and research emphasis has been on suturing devices and novel anastomotic tech-niques. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is efficacious and should be considered, particularly in the case of a capacious renal pelvis, crossing vessel, or failed previous endopyelotomy. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy is uniquely suitable for patients with aberrant anatomy, such as a horseshoe kidney, and may be performed concurrently with pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The use of laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation awaits further develop-ment in both open and subtrigonal injection techniques. Its use in colposuspension is undetermined and requires further study as suturing technology improves. During laparoscopic exploration, it is possible to address intra-operative injuries to the ureter and bladder laparoscopic-ally. In summary, laparoscopic surgery of the urinary tract is a “work in progress,” but it offers promise for some of the most challenging of circumstances. As the technology advances and the clinical experience widens, the indications and contraindications for these techniques will be better established. © 2001, Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 164
页数:10
相关论文
共 99 条
  • [71] Herschorn S., Steele D.J., Radomski S.B., Followup of intra-urethral collagen for female stress urinary incontinence, J Urol, 156, pp. 1305-1309, (1996)
  • [72] Cross C.A., Cespedes R.D., McGuire E.J., Our experience with pubovaginal slings in patients with stress urinary inconti-nence, J Urol, 159, pp. 1195-1198, (1998)
  • [73] Chaikin D.C., Rosenthal J., Blaivas J.G., Pubovaginal fascial sling for all types of stress urinary incontinence: long-term analysis, J Urol, 160, pp. 1312-1316, (1998)
  • [74] FitzGerald M.P., Gitelis S., Brubaker L., Pubic osteomyelitis and granuloma after bone anchor placement, Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 10, pp. 346-348, (1999)
  • [75] Lobel R.W., Davis G.D., Long-term results of laparoscopic Burch urethropexy, J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 3, pp. S26-S27, (1996)
  • [76] McDougall E.M., Heidorn C.A., Portis A.J., Klutke C.G., Laparo-scopic bladder neck suspension fails the test of time, J Urol, 162, pp. 2078-2081, (1999)
  • [77] Papasakelariou C., Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension, J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 2, (1995)
  • [78] Miannay E., Cosson M., Lanvin D., Et al., Comparison of open retropubic and laparoscopic colposuspension for treatment of stress urinary incontinence, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 79, pp. 159-166, (1998)
  • [79] Polascik T.J., Moore R.G., Rosenberg M.T., Kavoussi L.R., Et al., Comparison of laparoscopic and open retropubic urethro-pexy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence, Urology, 45, pp. 647-652, (1995)
  • [80] Albala D.M., Schuessler W.W., Vancaillie T.G., Laparoscopic bladder suspension for the treatment of stress incontinence, Semin Urol, 10, pp. 222-226, (1992)