On the organizational design of entrepreneurial ventures: the configurations of the entrepreneurial team

被引:0
作者
Paola Rovelli
Vincenzo Butticè
机构
[1] Free University of Bozen-Bolzano,Faculty of Economics and Management, Centre for Family Business Management
[2] Politecnico di Milano School of Management,Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering
来源
Journal of Industrial and Business Economics | 2020年 / 47卷
关键词
Entrepreneurial ventures; Entrepreneurial teams; Organizational design; Organizational configurations; L22; L26;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Several studies claim that entrepreneurial ventures should pay attention to their organizational design in order to improve performance. However, a clear understanding of these ventures’ organizational design is still missing. In this paper, we borrow the key organizational design elements from the literature on established firms and we study them simultaneously to provide a first empirical overview on the organization of the entrepreneurial ventures. Specifically, we investigate whether and how organizational design elements cluster together in different organizational configurations. To do so, we analyze a sample of 255 Italian entrepreneurial ventures, focusing on their entrepreneurial team and on the most important organizational design elements: hierarchical structure, size, functional specialization, and allocation of decision authority. To this end, we first use t tests, ANOVA tests, and Scheffe post hoc tests to explore the associations between the organizational design elements and four contingency factors (i.e., entrepreneurial venture’s size, age, industry, and geographical location). Then, we adopt a two-step cluster analysis to understand whether and how the complementarities and interdependencies among organizational design elements give rise to organizational configurations. Results reveal the presence of three distinct configurations, which we named collaborative ET, centric ET, and professional ET.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 269
页数:26
相关论文
共 222 条
[41]  
Carpenter MA(2000)Hierarchies and the organization of knowledge in production Journal of Political Economy 108 874-904
[42]  
Gelekanycz MA(2004)The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity Academy of Management Journal 47 209-226
[43]  
Sanders WG(1996)Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm Strategic Management Journal 17 109-122
[44]  
Caruana A(2010)Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: An exploratory study on technology ventures Strategic Management Journal 31 1337-1356
[45]  
Morris MH(2011)Multimarket competition, mobility barriers, and firm performance Journal of Management Studies 48 857-890
[46]  
Vella AJ(2019)Founder–inventors and their investors: Spurring firm survival and growth Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 13 288-325
[47]  
Child J(1993)Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion Academy of Management Journal 36 844-863
[48]  
Collins CJ(1992)Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies Management Science 38 1445-1466
[49]  
Clark KD(2002)Organization design Management Science 48 852-865
[50]  
Colombo MG(2005)Allocation of decision-making authority Review of Finance 9 1-31