On the organizational design of entrepreneurial ventures: the configurations of the entrepreneurial team

被引:0
作者
Paola Rovelli
Vincenzo Butticè
机构
[1] Free University of Bozen-Bolzano,Faculty of Economics and Management, Centre for Family Business Management
[2] Politecnico di Milano School of Management,Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering
来源
Journal of Industrial and Business Economics | 2020年 / 47卷
关键词
Entrepreneurial ventures; Entrepreneurial teams; Organizational design; Organizational configurations; L22; L26;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Several studies claim that entrepreneurial ventures should pay attention to their organizational design in order to improve performance. However, a clear understanding of these ventures’ organizational design is still missing. In this paper, we borrow the key organizational design elements from the literature on established firms and we study them simultaneously to provide a first empirical overview on the organization of the entrepreneurial ventures. Specifically, we investigate whether and how organizational design elements cluster together in different organizational configurations. To do so, we analyze a sample of 255 Italian entrepreneurial ventures, focusing on their entrepreneurial team and on the most important organizational design elements: hierarchical structure, size, functional specialization, and allocation of decision authority. To this end, we first use t tests, ANOVA tests, and Scheffe post hoc tests to explore the associations between the organizational design elements and four contingency factors (i.e., entrepreneurial venture’s size, age, industry, and geographical location). Then, we adopt a two-step cluster analysis to understand whether and how the complementarities and interdependencies among organizational design elements give rise to organizational configurations. Results reveal the presence of three distinct configurations, which we named collaborative ET, centric ET, and professional ET.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 269
页数:26
相关论文
共 222 条
[1]  
Adler PS(1999)Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system Organization Science 10 43-68
[2]  
Goldoftas B(1997)Formal and real authority in organizations Journal of Political Economy 105 1-29
[3]  
Levine DI(1996)Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for Top Management Teams Academy of Management Journal 39 123-148
[4]  
Aghion P(1995)Innovation, growth and survival International Journal of Industrial Organization 13 441-457
[5]  
Tirole J(1999)Start-up size and industrial dynamics: Some evidence from Italian manufacturing International Journal of Industrial Organization 17 965-983
[6]  
Amason AC(1989)Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal 10 107-124
[7]  
Audretsch DB(1996)The road taken: Origins and evolution of employment systems in emerging companies Industrial and Corporate Change 5 239-275
[8]  
Audretsch DB(1999)Engineering bureaucracy: The genesis of formal policies, positions, and structures in high-technology firms Journal of Law Economics and Organization 15 1-41
[9]  
Santarelli E(1999)Building the iron cage: Determinants of managerial intensity in the early years of organizations American Sociological Review 64 527-547
[10]  
Vivarelli M(2008)Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO Organization Science 19 3-24