A Retrospective Quasi-Experimental Study of a Transitional Housing Program for Patients with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness

被引:0
作者
Dan Siskind
Meredith Harris
Steve Kisely
Victor Siskind
James Brogan
Jane Pirkis
David Crompton
Harvey Whiteford
机构
[1] The University of Queensland,Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, School of Population Health
[2] The University of Queensland,School of Medicine
[3] Metro South Mental Health Service,Health LinQ
[4] The University of Queensland,Griffith Institute of Health
[5] Griffith University,Centre for Health Policy, Programs and Economics, School of Population Health
[6] Queensland University of Technology,undefined
[7] University of Melbourne,undefined
来源
Community Mental Health Journal | 2014年 / 50卷
关键词
Mental health; Service evaluation; Homelessness; Transitional housing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transitional housing programs aim to improve living skills and housing stability for tenuously housed patients with mental illness. 113 consecutive Transitional Housing Team (THT) patients were matched to 139 controls on diagnosis, time of presentation, gender and prior psychiatric hospitalisation and compared using a difference-in-difference analysis for illness acuity and service use outcomes measured 1 year before and after THT entry/exit. There was a statistically significant difference-in-difference favouring THT participants for bed days (mean difference in difference −20.76 days, SE 9.59, p = 0.031) and living conditions (HoNOS Q11 mean difference in difference −0.93, SE 0.23, p < 0.001). THT cost less per participant (I$14,024) than the bed-days averted (I$17,348). The findings of reductions in bed days and improved living conditions suggest that transitional housing programs can have a significant positive impact for tenuously housed patients with high inpatient service usage, as well as saving costs for mental health services.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 547
页数:9
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Babidge NC(2001)Mortality among homeless people with schizophrenia in Sydney, Australia: A 10-year follow-up Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 103 105-110
[2]  
Buhrich N(1999)Validation of the health of the nation outcome scales The British Journal of Psychiatry 174 389-394
[3]  
Butler T(2009)What does ‘clinical significance’ mean in the context of the health of the nation outcome scales? Australasian Psychiatry: Bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 17 141-148
[4]  
Bebbington P(2005)Place first, then train: An alternative to the medical model of psychiatric rehabilitation Social Work 50 31-39
[5]  
Brugha T(2005)Prevalence and risk factors for homelessness and utilization of mental health services among 10,340 patients with serious mental illness in a large public mental health system The American Journal of Psychiatry 162 370-376
[6]  
Hill T(2009)A cost analysis of san diego county’s REACH program for homeless persons Psychiatric Services (Washington, DC) 60 445-450
[7]  
Marsden L(2012)Planning estimates for the provision of core mental health services in Queensland 2007 to 2017 Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 46 982-994
[8]  
Window S(2003)The configuration of mental health services to facilitate care for people with schizophrenia The Medical Journal of Australia 178 S49-S52
[9]  
Burgess P(2012)A place to live: Housing needs for people with psychotic disorders identified in the second Australian national survey of psychosis Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 46 840-850
[10]  
Trauer T(2012)Implementation of assertive community treatment in Australia: Model fidelity, patient characteristics and staff experiences Community Mental Health Journal 48 652-661