Effects of Restored Stream Buffers on Water Quality in Non-tidal Streams in the Choptank River Basin

被引:0
作者
Adrienne J. Sutton
Thomas R. Fisher
Anne B. Gustafson
机构
[1] University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science,Horn Point Laboratory
[2] Oregon State University,undefined
来源
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution | 2010年 / 208卷
关键词
Agricultural management; Water quality; Nutrients; Riparian buffers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Restoration of riparian buffers is an important component of nutrient reduction strategies in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. In 1998, Maryland adopted a Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP), which provides financial incentives to take agricultural land out of production to plant streamside vegetation. Between 1998 and 2005, 1–30% of streamside vegetation (average = 11%), was restored to forest or managed grass in 15 agriculturally dominated sub-basins in the Choptank River basin, a tributary of Chesapeake Bay. Pre-existing forested buffers represented 10–48% of the streamside (average = 33%), for a total of 12–61% buffered streamsides (average = 44%). Using multi-year water quality data collected before and after CREP implementation (1986, 2003–2006), we were unable to detect significant effects of CREP on baseflow nutrient concentrations based on the area of restored buffer, the percentage of restored streamside, or the percentage of total riparian buffer in the sub-basins (p > 0.05). Although CREP increased the average buffered streamside from 33% in the 1990s to 44% by 2005, N and P concentrations have not changed or have increased in some streams over the last 20 years. Reductions may not have occurred for the following reasons: (1) buffer age, width, and connectivity (gaps) between buffers are also important to nutrient reductions; (2) agricultural nutrient inputs may have increased during this period; and (3) riparian buffer restoration was not extensive enough by 2005 to have measurable affects on the stream water quality in these sub-basins. Significant effects of CREP may yet be resolved as the current CREP buffers mature; however, water quality data through 2006 in the Choptank basin do not yet show any significant effects.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 118
页数:17
相关论文
共 172 条
[21]  
Brinsfield RB(2002)Changes in land use/management and water quality in the Long Creek watershed Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38 1691-1701
[22]  
Magnien RE(1984)Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds BioScience 34 374-377
[23]  
Boyer EW(1995)Denitrification in a restored riparian forest wetland Journal of Environmental Quality 24 808-815
[24]  
Goodale CL(1997)Water quality functions of riparian forest buffers in Chesapeake Bay watersheds Environmental Management 21 687-712
[25]  
Jaworski NA(1989)Nutrient and sediment removal by vegetated filter strips Transactions. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 32 663-667
[26]  
Howarth RW(1992)External nutrient sources, internal nutrient pools, and phytoplankton production in Chesapeake Bay Estuaries 15 497-516
[27]  
Clausen JC(1998)Death by suffocation in the Gulf of Mexico Science 281 190-192
[28]  
Guillard K(2003)Before and after riparian management: Sediment and nutrient exports from a small agricultural catchment, Western Australia Journal of Hydrology 270 253-272
[29]  
Sigmund CM(2002)Phosphorus reductions following riparian restoration in two agricultural watersheds in Vermont, USA Water Science and Technology 45 51-60
[30]  
Dors KM(1997)The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones Annual Review of Ecological Systems 28 621-658