Developing Chinese Private International Law for Transnational Civil and Commercial Litigation: The 2024 New Chinese Civil Procedure Law

被引：0
作者：
Jie (Jeanne) Huang
机构：
[1] Associate Professor at the University of Sydney Law School,
来源：
Netherlands International Law Review | 2023年 / 70卷
关键词：
Jurisdiction; Service of process; Taking of evidence abroad; Foreign judgment recognition and enforcement; China; Sovereign immunity; Civil procedure;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
On 1 September 2023, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress amended the Chinese Civil Procedure Law which will come into effect on 1 January 2024 (‘the 2024 CPL’). The 2024 CPL brings significant changes to the entire procedure of transnational civil and commercial litigation in China covering jurisdiction, service of process, the taking of evidence abroad, and the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. It is critical for foreign states, courts, and parties which conduct business in China to understand this new legal development and to prepare for the changes. Adopting comparative-law and empirical research methods, this commentary aims to explain the new provisions for transnational civil litigation in the 2024 CPL and how they may be implemented in practice.
引用
收藏
页码：205 / 249
页数：44
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Borchers PJ(2021)Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court and ‘corporate tag jurisdiction’ in the Pennoyer era Case West Reserve Law Rev 72 45-90
[2]  
Brand RA(2015)Understanding judgments recognition N C J Int Law Commer Regul 40 877-907
[3]  
Huang J(2019)Enforcing foreign monetary judgments in China: breakthroughs, challenges, and solutions in the context of ‘One Belt One Road’ George Wash Int Law Rev 51 105-144
[4]  
Huang J(2019)Reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in China: promising developments, prospective challenges and proposed solutions Nordic J Int Law 88 250-279
[5]  
Jang J(2020)The public policy exception under the new 2019 HCCH Judgments Convention Neth Int Law Rev 67 97-111
[6]  
Knop K(2017)Space, time, and historical injustice: a feminist conflict-of-laws approach to the Comfort Women Agreement Cornell Law Rev 102 853-928
[7]  
Riles A(2011)Justice without judges: the case filing division in the People’s Republic of China Univ Calif Davis J Int Law Policy 17 283-343
[8]  
Liu N(2014)Too much process, not enough service: international service of process under the Hague Service Convention Temple Law Rev 86 331-368
[9]  
Liu M(1972)Unblinkering the unruly horse: public policy in the law of contract Camb Law J 30 144-167
[10]  
Porterfield E(1978)Commentaries on Shaffer v. Heitner: Shaffer v. Heitner: the end of an era NY Univ Law Rev 53 33-101
12