Understanding Turkish students’ preferences for distance education depending on financial circumstances: A large-scale CHAID analysis

被引:2
作者
Firat M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Distance Education, Open Education Faculty, Anadolu University, Eskisehir
关键词
Chi squared Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) analysis; Distance education; household income; student preferences;
D O I
10.1007/s11159-017-9633-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the past, distance education was used as a method to meet the educational needs of citizens with limited options to attend an institution of higher education. Nowadays, it has become irreplaceable in higher education thanks to developments in instructional technology. But the question of why students choose distance education is still important. The purpose of this study was to determine Turkish students’ reasons for choosing distance education and to investigate how these reasons differ depending on their financial circumstances. The author used a Chi squared Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) analysis to determine 18,856 Turkish students’ reasons for choosing distance education. Results of the research revealed that Turkish students chose distance education not because of geographical limitations, family-related problems or economic difficulties, but for such reasons as already being engaged in their profession, increasing their knowledge, and seeking promotion to a better position. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 212
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Allen M., Bourhis J., Burrell N., Mabry E., Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis, The American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 2, pp. 83-97, (2002)
  • [2] Biggs D., De Ville B., Suen E., A method of choosing multi-way partitions for classification and decision trees, Journal of Applied Statistics, 18, 1, pp. 49-62, (1991)
  • [3] Bonk C.J., Lee M.M., Reeves T.C., Reynolds T.H., (Eds), (2015)
  • [4] Bray N.J., Harris M.S., Major C., New verse or the same old chorus? Looking holistically at distance education research, Research in Higher Education, 48, 7, pp. 889-908, (2007)
  • [5] Dudley W.N., Dilorio C., Soet J., Detecting and explicating interactions in categorical data, Nursing Research, 49, 1, pp. 53-56, (2000)
  • [6] Firat M., Determination of educators’ radical and transformative approaches on the future of schools, Journal of Future Education, 1, 2, pp. 15-30, (2012)
  • [7] Firat M., Measuring the e-learning autonomy of distance education students, Open Praxis, 8, 3, pp. 191-201, (2016)
  • [8] Flinck R., The research project on two-way communication in distance education: An overview, Epistolodidactica, 1-2, pp. 3-10, (1979)
  • [9] Garrison D.R., Researching dropout in distance education, Distance Education, 8, 1, pp. 95-101, (1987)
  • [10] Gilbert S.W., Why distance education?, American Association for Higher Education Bulletin., 48, pp. 3-4, (1995)