Real-world use and clinical impact of an electronic patient-reported outcome tool in patients with solid tumors treated with immuno-oncology therapy

被引:6
作者
Dickson, Natalie R. [1 ]
Beauchamp, Karen D. [2 ]
Perry, Toni S. [3 ]
Roush, Ashley [1 ]
Goldschmidt, Deborah [4 ]
Edwards, Marie Louise [4 ]
Blakely, L. Johnetta [1 ]
机构
[1] Tennessee Oncol, 2004 Hayes St 8th Floor, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ USA
[3] Varian Med Syst, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Anal Grp Inc, New York, NY USA
关键词
Community oncology practice; Duration of therapy; Electronic medical records; Electronic patient-reported outcome; Health-related quality of life; Immuno-oncology therapy; Overall survival; Real-world; Symptom management; Symptom reporting; CANCER-TREATMENT; SYMPTOMS; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s41687-024-00700-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Utilization of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) tools to monitor symptoms in patients undergoing cancer treatment has shown clinical benefits. Tennessee Oncology (TO) implemented an ePRO platform in 2019, allowing patients to report their health status online. We conducted a real-world, multicenter, observational, non-interventional cohort study to evaluate utilization of this platform in adults with solid tumors who initiated immuno-oncology (IO) therapy as monotherapy or in combination at TO clinics. Methods Patients initiating IO therapy prior to platform implementation were included in a historical control (HC) cohort; those initiating treatment after implementation were included in the ePRO cohort, which was further divided into ePRO users (platform enrollment <= 45 days from IO initiation) and non-users. Data were extracted from electronic medical records; patients were followed for up to 6 months (no minimum follow up). Outcomes included patient characteristics, treatment patterns, duration of therapy (DoT), and overall survival (OS). Results Data were collected for 538 patients in the HC and 1014 in the ePRO cohort; 319 in the ePRO cohort were ePRO users (uptake rate 31%). Baseline age was higher, more patients had stage IV disease at diagnosis, and more received monotherapy (82 vs 52%, respectively) in the HC vs the ePRO cohort. Median follow-up was 181.0 days (range 0.0-182.6) in the HC and 175.0 (0.0-184.0) in the ePRO cohort. Median DoT of index IO regimen was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4-NE) in the HC cohort vs not estimable (NE) in the ePRO cohort. Multivariable regression adjusting for baseline differences confirmed lower risk of treatment discontinuation in the ePRO vs HC cohort: hazard ratio (HR) 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.97); p < 0.05. The estimated 6-month OS rate was 65.5% in the HC vs 72.4% in the ePRO cohort (p < 0 .01). Within the ePRO cohort, DoT of index IO regimen and OS did not differ between users and non-users. In ePRO users, patient platform use was durable over 6 months. Conclusion Improvements in DoT and OS were seen after ePRO platform implementation. Conclusions are limited by challenges in separating the impact of platform implementation from other changes affecting outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Digital health for optimal supportive care in oncology: benefits, limits, and future perspectives [J].
Aapro, M. ;
Bossi, P. ;
Dasari, A. ;
Fallowfield, L. ;
Gascon, P. ;
Geller, M. ;
Jordan, K. ;
Kim, J. ;
Martin, K. ;
Porzig, S. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (10) :4589-4612
[2]   Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended 4-year follow-up of the phase III CheckMate 214 trial [J].
Albiges, Laurence ;
Tannir, Nizar M. ;
Burotto, Mauricio ;
McDermott, David ;
Plimack, Elizabeth R. ;
Barthelemy, Philippe ;
Porta, Camillo ;
Powles, Thomas ;
Donskov, Frede ;
George, Saby ;
Kollmannsberger, Christian K. ;
Gurney, Howard ;
Grimm, Marc-Oliver ;
Tomita, Yoshihiko ;
Castellano, Daniel ;
Rini, Brian, I ;
Choueiri, Toni K. ;
Saggi, Shruti Shally ;
McHenry, M. Brent ;
Motzer, Robert J. .
ESMO OPEN, 2020, 5 (06)
[3]   Exploring the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care: Need for more real-world evidence results in the peer reviewed literature [J].
Anatchkova M. ;
Donelson S.M. ;
Skalicky A.M. ;
McHorney C.A. ;
Jagun D. ;
Whiteley J. .
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2 (1)
[4]   Opportunities and challenges to advance the use of electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical care: a report from AMIA workshop proceedings [J].
Austin, Elizabeth ;
LeRouge, Cynthia ;
Hartzler, Andrea L. ;
Chung, Arlene E. ;
Segal, Courtney ;
Lavallee, Danielle C. .
JAMIA OPEN, 2019, 2 (04) :407-410
[5]   Does routine symptom screening with ESAS decrease ED visits in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy? [J].
Barbera, L. ;
Sutradhar, R. ;
Howell, D. ;
Sussman, J. ;
Seow, H. ;
Dudgeon, D. ;
Atzema, C. ;
Earle, C. ;
Husain, A. ;
Liu, Y. ;
Krzyzanowska, M. K. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (10) :3025-3032
[6]   Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Deal, Allison M. ;
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Scher, Howard I. ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Hudis, Clifford ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (02) :197-198
[7]   Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Deal, Allison M. ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Scher, Howard I. ;
Hudis, Clifford A. ;
Sabbatini, Paul ;
Rogak, Lauren ;
Bennett, Antonia V. ;
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Atkinson, Thomas M. ;
Chou, Joanne F. ;
Dulko, Dorothy ;
Sit, Laura ;
Barz, Allison ;
Novotny, Paul ;
Fruscione, Michael ;
Sloan, Jeff A. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (06) :557-+
[8]   Supporting Clinical Practice Decisions With Real-Time Patient-Reported Outcomes [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Abernethy, Amy P. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (08) :954-956
[9]   Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Summary [J].
Brahmer, Julie R. ;
Lacchetti, Christina ;
Thompson, John A. .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2018, 14 (04) :247-+
[10]   Nivolumab plus Cabozantinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma [J].
Choueiri, T. K. ;
Powles, T. ;
Burotto, M. ;
Escudier, B. ;
Bourlon, M. T. ;
Zurawski, B. ;
Juarez, V. M. Oyervides ;
Hsieh, J. J. ;
Basso, U. ;
Shah, A. Y. ;
Suarez, C. ;
Hamzaj, A. ;
Goh, J. C. ;
Barrios, C. ;
Richardet, M. ;
Porta, C. ;
Kowalyszyn, R. ;
Feregrino, J. P. ;
Zolnierek, J. ;
Pook, D. ;
Kessler, E. R. ;
Tomita, Y. ;
Mizuno, R. ;
Bedke, J. ;
Zhang, J. ;
Maurer, M. A. ;
Simsek, B. ;
Ejzykowicz, F. ;
Schwab, G. M. ;
Apolo, A. B. ;
Motzer, R. J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 384 (09) :829-841