A randomized trial of combination anastrozole plus gefitinib and of combination fulvestrant plus gefitinib in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer

被引:0
作者
Robert W. Carlson
Anne O’Neill
Tatiana Vidaurre
Henry L. Gomez
Sunil S. Badve
George W. Sledge
机构
[1] Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group,Department of Medicine
[2] Stanford University,Department of Biostatistics & Computational Biology
[3] Dana Farber Cancer Institute,Department of Medical Oncology
[4] Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas,Department of Pathology
[5] Indiana University,undefined
[6] Indiana University Simon Cancer Center,undefined
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2012年 / 133卷
关键词
Metastatic breast cancer; Gefitinib; Anastrozole; Fulvestrant; Randomized phase II;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
EGFR signalling pathways appear involved in endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer. This trial estimates the antitumor efficacy and toxicity of the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in combination with anastrozole or fulvestrant in postmenopausal hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Subjects with estrogen receptor and/or PgR positive, metastatic breast cancer were randomized into this phase II study of gefitinib (initial dose was 500 mg orally daily, due to high rate of diarrhea, starting dose was reduced to 250 mg orally daily) with either anastrozole 1 mg daily or fulvestrant 250 mg every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit (complete responses plus partial responses plus stable disease for 6 months or longer). 141 eligible subjects were enrolled, 72 in the anastrozole plus gefitinib arm, and 69 in the fulvestrant plus gefitinib arm. Anastrozole plus gefitinib had a clinical benefit rate of 44% [95% confidence interval (CI) 33–57%] and fulvestrant plus gefitinib 41% (95% CI 29–53%). Median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95% CI 3.1–10.4) versus 5.2 months (95% CI 2.9–8.2) for anastrozole plus gefitinib versus fulvestrant plus gefitinib, respectively. Median survival was 30.3 months (95% CI 21.2–38.9+) versus 23.9 months (95% CI 15.4–33.5) for anastrozole plus gefitinib versus fulvestrant plus gefitinib, respectively. In general, the toxicity is greater than expected for single agent endocrine therapy alone. Anastrozole plus gefitinib and fulvestrant plus gefitinib have similar clinical benefit rates in the treatment of estrogen and/or PgR positive metastatic breast cancer, and the rates of response are not clearly superior to gefitinib or endocrine therapy alone. Further studies of EGFR inhibition plus endocrine therapy do not appear warranted, but if performed should include attempts to identify biomarkers predictive of antitumor activity.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1056
页数:7
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]  
Nicholson RI(1994)Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in breast cancer: association with response to endocrine therapy Breast Cancer Res Treat 29 117-125
[2]  
McClelland RA(2004)Tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells is accompanied by an enhanced motile and invasive phenotype: inhibition by gefitinib (‘Iressa’, ZD1839) Clin Exp Metastasis 21 201-212
[3]  
Gee JM(2005)Resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 56 39-46
[4]  
Manning DL(2004)HER-2 amplification, HER-1 expression, and tamoxifen response in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a southwest oncology group study Clin Cancer Res 10 5670-5676
[5]  
Cannon P(2008)Tamoxifen resistance in breast tumors is driven by growth factor receptor signaling with repression of classic estrogen receptor genomic function Cancer Res 68 826-833
[6]  
Robertson JF(2009)Activation of ErbB3, EGFR and Erk is essential for growth of human breast cancer cell lines with acquired resistance to fulvestrant Breast Cancer Res Treat 114 263-275
[7]  
Ellis IO(1992)The clinical significance of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) in human breast cancer: a review on 5232 patients Endocr Rev 13 3-17
[8]  
Blamey RW(2010)The effects of gefitinib in tamoxifen-resistant and hormone-insensitive breast cancer: a phase II study Int J Cancer 126 1806-1816
[9]  
Hiscox S(2000)New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada J Natl Cancer Inst 92 205-216
[10]  
Morgan L(1988)The definition of the ‘no change’ category in patients treated with endocrine therapy and chemotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the breast Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 24 1567-1572