Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a systematic review

被引:0
作者
Yoshito Akagi
Tetsushi Kinugasa
Kazuo Shirouzu
机构
[1] Kurume University School of Medicine,Department of Surgery
来源
Surgery Today | 2013年 / 43卷
关键词
Rectal cancer; Intersphincteric resection; Local recurrence; Survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Radical surgical treatment for very low rectal cancer near the anus has generally involved abdominoperineal resection. Various sphincter-saving operations have been developed for such tumors to optimize the patients’ postoperative quality of life. Current protocols focus on intersphincteric resection (ISR), which differs from conventional hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis (CAA) after low anterior resection. However, the efficacy of ISR remains unclear. The surgical, oncologic, and functional outcomes after intersphincteric resection (ISR) were reviewed. This review of the current literature was conducted by searching the PubMed online database. Articles focusing specifically on conventional hand-sewn CAA were excluded from this study. The mean mortality rate is <2 %, and the mean morbidity rate ranges from 7.7 to 38.3 %. The mean local recurrence rate varies widely from 0 to 22.7 %, with a mean follow-up duration of 40–94 months. The mean disease-free and overall 5-year survival rates are 69–86 and 79–97 months, respectively. Functional outcomes are generally acceptable, but accurate evaluation is extremely difficult due to the absence of unified appraisal methods. ISR appears surgically, oncologically and functionally acceptable. However, more experience and better understanding of the oncology, anal physiology, and pelvic anatomy are necessary to achieve successful outcomes without complications, and to improve patient survival.
引用
收藏
页码:838 / 847
页数:9
相关论文
共 295 条
[21]  
Morihiro M(2003)Rectal resection with low anastomosis: functional outcome Colorectal Dis 5 458-464
[22]  
Kosugi C(2009)Analysis of clinical factors associated with anal function after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 52 64-70
[23]  
Köhler A(2007)Functional results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer Br J Surg 94 1272-1277
[24]  
Athanasiadis S(2011)Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 54 963-968
[25]  
Ommer A(1972)Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis Proc R Soc Med 65 975-976
[26]  
Psarakis E(1977)Intersphincteric excision of the rectum Br J Surg 64 413-416
[27]  
Vorobiev GI(2008)Intersphincteric resection with partial removal of external anal sphincter for low rectal cancer Acta Chir Iugosl 55 45-53
[28]  
Odaryuk TS(2004)Comparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 47 832-838
[29]  
Tsarkov PV(1982)Mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery: the clue to pelvic recurrence Br J Surg 69 613-616
[30]  
Talalakin AI(2009)Histopathologic tumor spread in very low rectal cancer treated with abdominoperineal resection Dis Colon Rectum 52 1887-1894