Uterocervical angle versus cervical length in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in women with history of spontaneous preterm birth: a prospective observational study

被引:0
作者
Ahmed Mohammed Elmaraghy
Salma Mohamed Ahmed Shaaban
Mohammed Salah Elsokkary
Ibrahim Shazly Mohamed Amen Elshazly
机构
[1] Ain Shams University,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine
[2] Ministry of health,Alexandria specialized hospital
来源
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | / 23卷
关键词
Preterm birth; Anterior uterocervical angle; Cervical length;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 135 条
  • [1] Walani SR(2020)Global burden of preterm birth Int J Gynaecol Obstet 150 31-33
  • [2] Chawanpaiboon S(2019)Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis Lancet Glob Health 7 e37-e46
  • [3] Vogel JP(2017)Preterm Labor Prevention and Management Am Fam Physician. 95 366-372
  • [4] Moller AB(2020)Risk factors associated with preterm birth: a retrospective study in Mukalla Maternity and Childhood Hospital Hadhramout Coast/Yemen Sudan J Paediatr 20 99-110
  • [5] Lumbiganon P(2016)Management of a woman with a previous spontaneous preterm birth Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med 26 101-107
  • [6] Petzold M(2016)Impact of preterm birth on maternal well-being and women's perceptions of their baby: a population-based survey BMJ Open. 6 e012676-456
  • [7] Hogan D(2020)The epidemiologic characteristics and associated risk factors of preterm birth from 2004 to 2013 in Taiwan BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 20 201-1312
  • [8] Landoulsi S(2022)ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 60 435-308
  • [9] Jampathong N(2020)Preterm birth prediction in asymptomatic women at mid-gestation using a panel of novel protein biomarkers: the Prediction of PreTerm Labor (PPeTaL) study Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2 1305-362
  • [10] Kongwattanakul K(2021)Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth by cervical length in the first trimester of pregnancy: Comparison of two measurement methods Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 100 304-1518