Why Social Science is Biological Science

被引:1
作者
Alex Rosenberg
机构
[1] Duke University,Department of Philosophy
来源
Journal for General Philosophy of Science | 2017年 / 48卷
关键词
Biology; Darwinian theory; Cultural evolution; Strategies; Packages of strategies; Functions; Selected effects;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The social sciences need to take seriously their status as divisions of biology. As such they need to recognize the central role of Darwinian processes in all the phenomena they seek to explain. An argument for this claim is formulated in terms of a small number of relatively precise premises that focus on the nature of the kinds and taxonomies of all the social sciences. The analytical taxonomies of all the social sciences are shown to require a Darwinian approach to human affairs, though not a nativist or genetically driven theory by any means. Non-genetic Darwinian processes have the fundamental role on all human affairs. I expound a general account of how Darwinian processes operate in human affairs by selecting for strategies and sets of strategies individuals and groups employ. I conclude by showing how a great deal of social science can be organized in accordance with Tinbergen’s approach to biological inquiry, an approach required by the fact that the social sciences are all divisions of biology, and in particular the studies of one particular biological species.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 369
页数:28
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Bateson P(2013)Tinbergen’s four questions: An appreciation and update Trends in Ecology and Evolution xx 1-7
  • [2] Laland K(1937)The nature of the firm Economica 4 386-405
  • [3] Coase RH(2008)The problem of adaptive individual choice in cultural evolution Biology and Philosophy 23 101-113
  • [4] Driscoll C(1979)The spandrels of san marco and the panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 205 581-598
  • [5] Gould SJ(1982)Exaptation, a missing term in the science of form Paleobiology 8 4-15
  • [6] Lewontin RC(1994)Kant or Cant: The myth of the democratic peace International Security 19 5-49
  • [7] Gould SJ(1996)Ending footbinding and infibulation: A convention account, gerry American Sociological Review 61 999-1017
  • [8] Vrba ES(1993)Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986 American Political Science Review 87 624-638
  • [9] Layne C(1963)On the aims of ethology Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 20 410-433
  • [10] Mackie G(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined