Economic comparison of greenhouse gas mitigation options in Germany

被引:0
|
作者
Ronald D. Sands
Katja Schumacher
机构
[1] Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,Joint Global Change Research Institute
[2] Öko-Institut e.V. (Institute for Applied Ecology),undefined
来源
Energy Efficiency | 2009年 / 2卷
关键词
Greenhouse gas mitigation options; Energy efficiency; Fuel switch; Carbon dioxide capture and storage; Non-CO; greenhouse gases; General equilibrium modeling; Economic effects; Climate policy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Our objective is to provide a balanced analysis of greenhouse gas mitigation options, across a variety of climate policy scenarios, for Germany. At least four classes of greenhouse gas mitigation options are available: energy efficiency, fuel switching, CO2 capture and storage (CCS), and reductions in emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases. These options vary by cost, timing, and our ability to represent them in an economic analysis. We use the Second Generation Model, an economy-wide computable general equilibrium (CGE) model that embodies greenhouse gas mitigation possibilities from the energy system and CCS. Policy scenarios are represented as a response to varying levels of a price for greenhouse gas emissions, either applied economy-wide or targeted at energy-intensive sectors of the economy according to the EU emissions trading scheme. Energy efficiency options are represented in the standard CGE format where non-energy inputs substitute for energy inputs within economic production functions, or system of consumer demand equations, as the price of energy increases relative to other goods. The electric power sector provides substantial opportunities for fuel switching and the deployment of advanced electricity-generating technologies, with and without CO2 capture and storage. Our methodology relies on engineering descriptions of electricity-generating technologies and how their competitive positions vary with a CO2 price or change in fuel price. Further, we allow for reduction of emissions of non-CO2 gases, which adds a set of mitigation opportunities not usually included in energy-economic modeling efforts. A formal decomposition methodology is used to isolate the contribution of each greenhouse gas mitigation option.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 36
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gendered impacts of greenhouse gas mitigation options for rice cultivation in India
    Gartaula, Hom
    Sapkota, Tek
    Khatri-Chhetri, Arun
    Prasad, Gokul
    Badstue, Lone
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (02) : 1045 - 1063
  • [22] Policy and technological constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture
    Smith, Pete
    Martino, Daniel
    Cai, Zucong
    Gwary, Daniel
    Janzen, Henry
    Kumar, Pushpam
    McCarl, Bruce
    Ogle, Stephen
    O'Mara, Frank
    Rice, Charles
    Scholes, Bob
    Sirotenko, Oleg
    Howden, Mark
    McAllister, Tim
    Pan, Genxing
    Romanenkov, Vladimir
    Schneider, Uwe
    Towprayoon, Sirintornthep
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 118 (1-4) : 6 - 28
  • [23] Gendered impacts of greenhouse gas mitigation options for rice cultivation in India
    Hom Gartaula
    Tek B Sapkota
    Arun Khatri-Chhetri
    Gokul Prasad
    Lone Badstue
    Climatic Change, 2020, 163 : 1045 - 1063
  • [24] The greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options for materials used in UK construction
    Giesekam, Jannik
    Barrett, John
    Taylor, Peter
    Owen, Anne
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 78 : 202 - 214
  • [25] Economic and environmental impacts of greenhouse gas mitigation: An integrated assessment
    Newth, D.
    Gunasekera, D.
    Hanslow, K.
    Finnigan, J. J.
    19TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2011), 2011, : 2761 - 2767
  • [26] Avoided deforestation as a greenhouse gas mitigation tool: Economic issues
    Sohngen, Brent
    Beach, Robert H.
    Andrasko, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2008, 37 (04) : 1368 - 1375
  • [27] Greenhouse gas mitigation in a carbon constrained world - the role of CCS in Germany
    Schumacher, Katja
    Sands, Ronald
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 3755 - 3762
  • [28] Assessing mitigation options for greenhouse warming
    Thomas H.Lee
    Electricity, 1992, (01) : 5 - 11
  • [29] Strategic environmental assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation options in the Canadian agricultural sector
    Noble, Bram F.
    Christmas, Lisa M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 41 (01) : 64 - 78
  • [30] Strategic Environmental Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Options in the Canadian Agricultural Sector
    Bram F. Noble
    Lisa M. Christmas
    Environmental Management, 2008, 41 : 64 - 78