Assortative mating in the online market for sperm donation

被引:0
作者
Whyte S. [1 ]
Torgler B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, 2 George St., Brisbane, 4001, QLD
[2] CREMA—Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts, Basel
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Assortative mating; Matching; Mate choice; Online sperm donor market; Preferences; Reproduction;
D O I
10.1007/s10818-016-9232-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous studies on assortative mating have struggled to isolate preferences from actual constraints faced throughout the matching process, including the geographic and social propinquity that limit the availability of possible mates. Because such passive factors restrict the possibility set of potential partners, they may either restrict the chance of fulfilling mating preferences or lead to a high level of positive assortative mating. The possibility set may be further reduced by competition in the mating market. It is also unclear from couple’s data how much assortative mating is driven by partner selection to reduce anticipated child rearing problem and how much by a desire for parental assistance and altruistic preferences for offspring. Adopting the online market for sperm donation as the research setting reduces such problems: the more controlled setting ensures isolation of a male’s genetic impact on his offspring from other factors. By identifying the factors that influence the symmetry of characteristics between recipients and partners and recipients and donors chosen, we provide empirical evidence that even with limited constraints on available choice, women still exhibit homogamous donor preferences. Likewise, by exploring how potential donors’ characteristics match partner characteristics, we offer insights into what drives recipients’ desires to find donors who surpass both their own and their partners’ characteristics. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 194
页数:25
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Abramitzky R., Delavande A., Vasconcelos L., Marrying up: The role of sex ratio in assortative matching. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, SIEPR Discussion Paper No, 07-50, (2008)
  • [2] Botwin M.D., Buss D.M., Shackelford T.K., Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction, Journal of Personality, 65, pp. 107-136, (1997)
  • [3] Burley N., The meaning of assortative mating, Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 4, pp. 191-203, (1983)
  • [4] Burr J., Fear, fascination and the sperm donor as ‘abjection’in interviews with heterosexual recipients of donor insemination, Sociology of Health & Illness, 31, pp. 705-718, (2009)
  • [5] Buss D.M., Human mate selection: Opposites are sometimes said to attract, but in fact we are likely to marry someone who is similar to us in almost every variable, American Scientist, 73, 1, pp. 47-51, (1985)
  • [6] Buss D.M., Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1, pp. 1-49, (1989)
  • [7] Buss D.M., Social adaptation and five major factors of personality. The five-factor model of personality, The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspetives, pp. 180-207, (1996)
  • [8] Buss D.M., The evolution of happiness, American Psychologist, 55, 1, pp. 15-23, (2000)
  • [9] Buss D.M., Barnes M., Preferences in human mate selection, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 3, (1986)
  • [10] Cotton S., Small J., Pomiankowski A., Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences, Current Biology, 16, pp. R755-R765, (2006)