Scientific literature on freshwater ecosystem services: trends, biases, and future directions

被引:0
作者
João Carlos Nabout
Karine Borges Machado
Ana Clara Maciel David
Laura Beatriz Gomes Mendonça
Samiris Pereira da Silva
Priscilla Carvalho
机构
[1] Universidade Estadual de Goiás,
[2] Universidade Federal de Goiás,undefined
来源
Hydrobiologia | 2023年 / 850卷
关键词
Systematic review; Valuation; Supporting services; Regulating services; Provisioning services; Cultural services;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the scientific literature on aquatic ecosystem services. We used the Web of Science database for our research. We found a total of 1,367 articles, with 837 papers that studied ecosystem services provided through the interaction between terrestrial and aquatic environments (terrestrial–aquatic papers) and 530 papers relating only to aquatic environments. Despite the growing number of articles, there is still less research on aquatic environments compared to terrestrial environments. We found a correlation between types of services and taxonomic groups, such that supporting ecosystem services were investigated using mainly macroinvertebrate, microorganisms and aquatic macrophytes communities, while provisioning and cultural ecosystem services were frequently studied with fishes. The analysis of keywords revealed that there was a temporal shift in the terms studied, and some words presented a higher frequency in aquatic research. Nonetheless, other words appeared in aquatic and terrestrial–aquatic studies with similar frequencies. The trends and biases detected in the present paper can help us to understand the role of aquatic biodiversity in ecosystem services more fully in the future as well as assist in the creation of strategies for future studies on the conservation of these services.
引用
收藏
页码:2485 / 2499
页数:14
相关论文
共 350 条
[1]  
Abell R(2008)Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation BioScience 58 403-414
[2]  
Thieme ML(2019)Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation – An analysis of publications Ecosystem Services 39 646-652
[3]  
Revenga C(2005)Conservation of the biodiversity of Brazil's inland waters Conservation Biology 19 47-54
[4]  
Bryer M(2020)Use of macrophytes to reduce the contamination of water resources by Pesticides Ecological Indicators 109 678-688
[5]  
Kottelat M(2020)The capacity of northern peatlands for long-term carbon sequestration Biogeosciences 17 453-323
[6]  
Bogutskaya N(2017)Ecosystem services of Lake Erie: spatial distribution and concordance of multiple services Journal of Great Lakes Research 43 310-28
[7]  
Acharya RP(2018)Forest ecosystem services: an analysis of worldwide research Forests 9 15-158
[8]  
Maraseni T(2019)The worldwide research trends on water ecosystem services Ecological Indicators 99 153-852
[9]  
Cockfield G(2006)Energy and nutrient fluxes from rivers and streams into terrestrial food webs Marine and Freshwater Research 57 844-18
[10]  
Agostinho AA(2008)Trends in the scientific literature on phytoplankton Limnology 9 8-12