Blinded Sample Size Recalculation in Longitudinal Clinical Trials Using Generalized Estimating Equations

被引:0
|
作者
Daniel Wachtlin
Meinhard Kieser
机构
[1] University Medical Centre Mainz,Biometrics Department, Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Trials (IZKS)
[2] Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI),undefined
来源
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science | 2013年 / 47卷
关键词
sample size calculation; internal pilot study; generalized estimating equations; missing data; longitudinal clinical trials;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In clinical trials in which outcomes are measured repeatedly during the follow-up phase, data analysis is frequently performed using generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Sample size calculation is then especially challenging since in addition to the treatment effect, the intrasubject correlation and the variability of the model error term have to be specified. In this article, the authors investigated by Monte Carlo simulations whether a blinded midcourse estimation of these quantities in an internal pilot study design is feasible in such trials and whether nominal type I and type II error rates are preserved when the estimates are used for sample size recalculation. The actual type I error rates of the blinded sample size recalculation procedure turned out to agree well with the nominal levels. Furthermore, the simulated power was observed to be near the target value as long as the sample size of the internal pilot study was sufficiently high and the bound effects induced by the range of the correlation were limited. The proposed procedure is a helpful tool to achieve robustness of the power with respect to initial misspecifications in the planning stage in clinical trials analyzed by GEE.
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 467
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Data mining for longitudinal data under multicollinearity and time dependence using penalized generalized estimating equations
    Blommaert, A.
    Hens, N.
    Beutels, Ph
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2014, 71 : 667 - 680
  • [42] A comparison of bias-corrected empirical covariance estimators with generalized estimating equations in small-sample longitudinal study settings
    Ford, Whitney P.
    Westgate, Philip M.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2018, 37 (28) : 4318 - 4329
  • [43] Multiply Robust Weighted Generalized Estimating Equations for Incomplete Longitudinal Binary Data Using Empirical Likelihood
    Komazaki, Hiroshi
    Doi, Masaaki
    Yonemoto, Naohiro
    Sato, Tosiya
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 16 (01): : 116 - 129
  • [44] Regression modelling of weighted κ by using generalized estimating equations
    Gonin, R
    Lipsitz, SR
    Fitzmaurice, GM
    Molenberghs, G
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2000, 49 : 1 - 18
  • [45] A Note on the Use of Unbiased Estimating Equations to Estimate Correlation in Analysis of Longitudinal Trials
    Sun, Wenguang
    Shults, Justine
    Leonard, Mary
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 51 (01) : 5 - 18
  • [46] Multiply robust generalized estimating equations for cluster randomized trials with missing outcomes
    Rabideau, Dustin J.
    Li, Fan
    Wang, Rui
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (07) : 1458 - 1474
  • [47] Covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations (GEE) in longitudinal analysis with small samples
    Wang, Ming
    Kong, Lan
    Li, Zheng
    Zhang, Lijun
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (10) : 1706 - 1721
  • [48] Analyzing Cross-Sectionally Clustered Data Using Generalized Estimating Equations
    Huang, Francis L.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2022, 47 (01) : 101 - 125
  • [49] Approaches to sample size calculation for clinical trials in rare diseases
    Miller, Frank
    Zohar, Sarah
    Stallard, Nigel
    Madan, Jason
    Posch, Martin
    Hee, Siew Wan
    Pearce, Michael
    Vagero, Marten
    Day, Simon
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2018, 17 (03) : 214 - 230
  • [50] Predicting issuer credit ratings using generalized estimating equations
    Hwang, Ruey-Ching
    QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2013, 13 (03) : 383 - 398