Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies

被引:1
作者
Franklin S.J. [1 ]
Wright M. [2 ]
Lockett A. [2 ]
机构
[1] ANGLE Technology Limited, Enterprise House, Manchester M15 6SE, Manchester Science Park
[2] Center for Management Buy Out Research, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus
关键词
Economic Growth; Arena; Faculty Member; Industrial Organization; Leadership Role;
D O I
10.1023/A:1007896514609
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Universities have two options when they formulate policies to develop new technology-based start-ups. One approach is to encourage faculty members to engage in this activity. Another avenue is to encourage surrogate (external) entrepreneurs to assume a leadership role. Based on a survey of technology transfer/business development officers at 57 U.K. universities, we examine perceptions regarding the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. We also analyze whether there are significant differences in these attitudes between universities that have launched many start-ups and those that have been less active in this arena. Our results imply that the most significant barriers to the adoption of entrepreneurial-friendly policies are cultural and informational. We also find that universities that generate the most start-ups have more favorable attitudes towards surrogate entrepreneurs. It appears that a combination of academic and surrogate entrepreneurship might be the best approach for universities that wish to develop successful technology-transfer based start-up companies. © 2007 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 141
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] The Financing of Technology-based Firms, (1996)
  • [2] Tech Stars: Breaking the Growth Barriers for Technology-based SMEs, (1997)
  • [3] Chrisman J.J., Hynes T., Fraser S., Faculty Entrepreneurship and Economic Development: The Case of the University of Calgary, J. Business Venturing, 10, pp. 267-281, (1995)
  • [4] Cooper A.C., Gimeno-Gascon F.J., Woo C.Y., Initial Human and Financial Capital as Predictors of New Venture Performance, Journal of Business Venturing, 9, pp. 371-395, (1994)
  • [5] Crisp P., Melling G., Further and Higher Education: Accountability, Access… Anarchy?, Local Government Studies, 14, 1, pp. 31-38, (1988)
  • [6] Daniels G., Hofer C., Characteristics of Successful and Unsuccessful Entrepreneurial Faculty and Their Innovative Research Teams, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, pp. 598-609, (1993)
  • [7] De Vaus D.A., Surveys in Social Research, Third Edition, (1991)
  • [8] Doutriaux J., Growth Patterns of Academic Entrepreneurial Firms, Journal of Business Venturing, 2, pp. 285-297, (1987)
  • [9] Felsenstein D., University-Related Science Parks - 'Seedbeds' or 'Enclaves' of Innovation?, Technovation, 14, 2, pp. 93-110, (1994)
  • [10] Hartmon B., Ardishvili A., Cardozo R., Elder T., Leuthold J., Parshall J., Raghian M., Smith D., Mapping the University Technology Transfer Process, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, pp. 286-298, (1995)