Psychometric assessment and validation of the dysphagia severity rating scale in stroke patients

被引:0
作者
Lisa F. Everton
Jacqueline K. Benfield
Amanda Hedstrom
Gwenllian Wilkinson
Emilia Michou
Timothy J. England
Rainer Dziewas
Philip M. Bath
Shaheen Hamdy
机构
[1] Stroke Trials Unit,
[2] Division of Clinical Neuroscience,undefined
[3] University of Nottingham,undefined
[4] Speech and Language Therapy,undefined
[5] Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust,undefined
[6] Vascular Medicine,undefined
[7] Division of Medical Sciences and GEM,undefined
[8] University of Nottingham,undefined
[9] Royal Derby Hospital Centre,undefined
[10] Stroke,undefined
[11] Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust,undefined
[12] GI Sciences,undefined
[13] Division of Diabetes,undefined
[14] Endocrinology and Gastroenterology,undefined
[15] School of Medicine Sciences,undefined
[16] University of Manchester and the Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre,undefined
[17] Speech Language Pathology,undefined
[18] Communication Disorders and Dysphagia,undefined
[19] University of Patras,undefined
[20] Department of Neurology,undefined
[21] University Hospital Münster,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 10卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Post stroke dysphagia (PSD) is common and associated with poor outcome. The Dysphagia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS), which grades how severe dysphagia is based on fluid and diet modification and supervision requirements for feeding, is used for clinical research but has limited published validation information. Multiple approaches were taken to validate the DSRS, including concurrent- and predictive criterion validity, internal consistency, inter- and intra-rater reliability and sensitivity to change. This was done using data from four studies involving pharyngeal electrical stimulation in acute stroke patients with dysphagia, an individual patient data meta-analysis and unpublished studies (NCT03499574, NCT03700853). In addition, consensual- and content validity and the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) were assessed using anonymous surveys sent to UK-based Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs). Scores for consensual validity were mostly moderate (62.5–78%) to high or excellent (89–100%) for most scenarios. All but two assessments of content validity were excellent. In concurrent criterion validity assessments, DSRS was most closely associated with measures of radiological aspiration (penetration aspiration scale, Spearman rank rs = 0.49, p < 0.001) and swallowing (functional oral intake scale, FOIS, rs = −0.96, p < 0.001); weaker but statistically significant associations were seen with impairment, disability and dependency. A similar pattern of relationships was seen for predictive criterion validity. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was either “good” or “excellent”. Intra and inter-rater reliability were largely “excellent” (intraclass correlation >0.90). DSRS was sensitive to positive change during recovery (medians: 7, 4 and 1 at baseline and 2 and 13 weeks respectively) and in response to an intervention, pharyngeal electrical stimulation, in a published meta-analysis. The MCID was 1.0 and DSRS and FOIS scores may be estimated from each other. The DSRS appears to be a valid tool for grading the severity of swallowing impairment in patients with post stroke dysphagia and is appropriate for use in clinical research and clinical service delivery.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 47 条
[41]  
Hutcheson KA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[42]  
Cranston JS(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[43]  
Kaplan BD(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[44]  
Saver JL(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[45]  
Cichero JA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[46]  
Dziewas R(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[47]  
Sessler CN(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined