Psychometric assessment and validation of the dysphagia severity rating scale in stroke patients

被引:0
作者
Lisa F. Everton
Jacqueline K. Benfield
Amanda Hedstrom
Gwenllian Wilkinson
Emilia Michou
Timothy J. England
Rainer Dziewas
Philip M. Bath
Shaheen Hamdy
机构
[1] Stroke Trials Unit,
[2] Division of Clinical Neuroscience,undefined
[3] University of Nottingham,undefined
[4] Speech and Language Therapy,undefined
[5] Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust,undefined
[6] Vascular Medicine,undefined
[7] Division of Medical Sciences and GEM,undefined
[8] University of Nottingham,undefined
[9] Royal Derby Hospital Centre,undefined
[10] Stroke,undefined
[11] Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust,undefined
[12] GI Sciences,undefined
[13] Division of Diabetes,undefined
[14] Endocrinology and Gastroenterology,undefined
[15] School of Medicine Sciences,undefined
[16] University of Manchester and the Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre,undefined
[17] Speech Language Pathology,undefined
[18] Communication Disorders and Dysphagia,undefined
[19] University of Patras,undefined
[20] Department of Neurology,undefined
[21] University Hospital Münster,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 10卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Post stroke dysphagia (PSD) is common and associated with poor outcome. The Dysphagia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS), which grades how severe dysphagia is based on fluid and diet modification and supervision requirements for feeding, is used for clinical research but has limited published validation information. Multiple approaches were taken to validate the DSRS, including concurrent- and predictive criterion validity, internal consistency, inter- and intra-rater reliability and sensitivity to change. This was done using data from four studies involving pharyngeal electrical stimulation in acute stroke patients with dysphagia, an individual patient data meta-analysis and unpublished studies (NCT03499574, NCT03700853). In addition, consensual- and content validity and the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) were assessed using anonymous surveys sent to UK-based Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs). Scores for consensual validity were mostly moderate (62.5–78%) to high or excellent (89–100%) for most scenarios. All but two assessments of content validity were excellent. In concurrent criterion validity assessments, DSRS was most closely associated with measures of radiological aspiration (penetration aspiration scale, Spearman rank rs = 0.49, p < 0.001) and swallowing (functional oral intake scale, FOIS, rs = −0.96, p < 0.001); weaker but statistically significant associations were seen with impairment, disability and dependency. A similar pattern of relationships was seen for predictive criterion validity. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was either “good” or “excellent”. Intra and inter-rater reliability were largely “excellent” (intraclass correlation >0.90). DSRS was sensitive to positive change during recovery (medians: 7, 4 and 1 at baseline and 2 and 13 weeks respectively) and in response to an intervention, pharyngeal electrical stimulation, in a published meta-analysis. The MCID was 1.0 and DSRS and FOIS scores may be estimated from each other. The DSRS appears to be a valid tool for grading the severity of swallowing impairment in patients with post stroke dysphagia and is appropriate for use in clinical research and clinical service delivery.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Rosenbek J(1996)A penetration-aspiration scale Dysphagia 11 93-98
[2]  
Robbins J(2005)Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86 1516-1520
[3]  
Roecker E(2010)Adjunctive functional pharyngeal electrical stimulation reverses swallowing disability after brain lesions Gastroenterology 138 1737-1746
[4]  
Coyle J(1999)The Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale Dysphagia 14 139-145
[5]  
Wood J(2004)Disability measures in stroke. Relationship among the Barthel index, the Functional Independence measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale Stroke 35 918-923
[6]  
Crary MA(2016)Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation in Dysphagia Poststroke: A Prospective, Randomized Single-Blinded Interventional Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair 30 866-875
[7]  
Mann GD(2016)Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Dysphagia in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke 47 1562-1570
[8]  
Groher ME(2018)Pharyngeal electrical stimulation for early decannulation in tracheotomised patients with neurogenic dysphagia after stroke (PHAST-TRAC): a prospective, single-blinded, randomised trial Lancet Neurol 7 133-138
[9]  
Jayasekeran V(2012)Development, expansion, and use of a stroke clinical trials resource for novel exploratory analyses Int. J. Stroke 2015 429053-944
[10]  
O’Neil K(2015)Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Poststroke Dysphagia: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Stroke Res. Treat. 99 934-467