A randomized phase II trial of standard dose bevacizumab versus low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine (CCNU) in adults with recurrent glioblastoma

被引:0
作者
Shiao-Pei Weathers
Xiaosi Han
Diane D. Liu
Charles A. Conrad
Mark R. Gilbert
Monica E. Loghin
Barbara J. O’Brien
Marta Penas-Prado
Vinay K. Puduvalli
Ivo Tremont-Lukats
Rivka R. Colen
W. K. Alfred Yung
John F. de Groot
机构
[1] University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Department of Neuro
[2] University of Alabama at Birmingham,Oncology
[3] University of MD Anderson Cancer Center,Department of Biostatistics
[4] University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Department of Neuroradiology
[5] Texas Oncology,Department of Neurosurgery
[6] National Institutes of Health,undefined
[7] M410 Starling Loving Hall,undefined
[8] Houston Methodist Hospital,undefined
来源
Journal of Neuro-Oncology | 2016年 / 129卷
关键词
Glioblastoma; Bevacizumab; Lomustine; Angiogenesis; VEGF;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Antiangiogenic therapy can rapidly reduce vascular permeability and cerebral edema but high doses of bevacizumab may induce selective pressure to promote resistance. This trial evaluated the efficacy of low dose bevacizumab in combination with lomustine (CCNU) compared to standard dose bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients (N = 71) with recurrent glioblastoma who previously received radiation and temozolomide were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive bevacizumab monotherapy (10 mg/kg) or low dose bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) in combination with lomustine (90 mg/m2). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) based on a blinded, independent radiographic assessment of post-contrast T1-weighted and non-contrast T2/FLAIR weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using RANO criteria. For 69 evaluable patients, median PFS was not significantly longer in the low dose bevacizumab + lomustine arm (4.34 months, CI 2.96–8.34) compared to the bevacizumab alone arm (4.11 months, CI 2.69–5.55, p = 0.19). In patients with first recurrence, there was a trend towards longer median PFS time in the low dose bevacizumab + lomustine arm (4.96 months, CI 4.17–13.44) compared to the bevacizumab alone arm (3.22 months CI 2.5–6.01, p = 0.08). The combination of low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine was not superior to standard dose bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Although the study was not designed to exclusively evaluate patients at first recurrence, a strong trend towards improved PFS was seen in that subgroup for the combination of low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine. Further studies are needed to better identify such subgroups that may most benefit from the combination treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 494
页数:7
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Stupp R(2005)Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma N Engl J Med 352 987-996
[2]  
Mason WP(2013)Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial J Clin Oncol 31 4085-4091
[3]  
van den Bent MJ(1999)Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials J Clin Oncol 17 2572-2578
[4]  
Gilbert MR(2010)Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma J Clin Oncol 28 1168-1174
[5]  
Wang M(2005)Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine Nature 438 932-936
[6]  
Aldape KD(2005)Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy Science 307 58-62
[7]  
Wong ET(2009)FDA drug approval summary: bevacizumab (Avastin) as treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme Oncologist 14 1131-1138
[8]  
Hess KR(2007)Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme J Clin Oncol 25 4722-4729
[9]  
Gleason MJ(2007)Phase II trial of bevacizumab and irinotecan in recurrent malignant glioma Clin Cancer Res 13 1253-1259
[10]  
Wick W(2009)Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma J Clin Oncol 27 4733-4740