Civilization vs toleration: the new UN Human Rights Council and the normative foundations of the international order

被引:0
作者
Sibylle Scheipers
机构
[1] University of Oxford,Department of Politics and International Relations
来源
Journal of International Relations and Development | 2007年 / 10卷
关键词
human rights; North–South divide; standard of civilization; United Nations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article aims to explain the institutional design of the new United Nations (UN) human rights organ, the Human Rights Council (HRC). During the negotiation phase, it was contested between the North and the South: while the former opted for an exclusive body with a high membership threshold, the latter pressed for an inclusive structure and cooperative mechanisms. The eventual institutional design of the HRC features a moderate membership threshold. Both hegemonic stability theory and domestic-level approaches have difficulties explaining that outcome. I will argue that the institutional design of the HRC can be explained as the outcome of a discursive struggle between the North that promoted the paradigm of civilization and the South that endorsed the paradigm of toleration. The institutional design of the HRC, it will be argued, can be interpreted as a compromise between both paradigms in that it features a reflexive structure: the membership rules of the HRC contain the proviso that its members have to live up to the very standards that the HRC seeks to promote before they can legitimately place other states under scrutiny.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 242
页数:23
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Checkel JeffreyT(1998)The Constructivist Turn in International Relations World Politics 50 324-348
[2]  
Deitelhoff Nicole(2005)Theoretical Paradise — Empirically Lost? Arguing with Habermas Review of International Studies 31 167-179
[3]  
Müller Harald(1986)International Human Rights: A Regime Analysis International Organization 40 599-642
[4]  
Donnelly Jack(1998)Human Rights: A New Standard of Civilization? International Affairs 74 1-24
[5]  
Donnelly Jack(1998)International Norm Dynamics and Political Change International Organization 52 887-917
[6]  
Finnemore Martha(1993)Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis International Organization 47 443-78
[7]  
Sikkink Kathryn(1996)The New Politics of Voting Alignments in the United Nations General Assembly International Organization 50 629-652
[8]  
Guzzini Stefano(1998)Sovereignty and Inequality European Journal of International Law 9 599-625
[9]  
Kim SooYeon(1995)Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions Against South Africa International Organization 49 451-478
[10]  
Russett Bruce(1999)The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods European Journal of International Relations 5 225-254