Diversified spatial keyword search on RDF data

被引:0
作者
Zhi Cai
Georgios Kalamatianos
Georgios J. Fakas
Nikos Mamoulis
Dimitris Papadias
机构
[1] Beijing University of Technology,College of Computer Science
[2] Uppsala University,Department of Information Technology
[3] University of Ioannina,Department of Computer Science and Engineering
[4] HKUST,Department of Computer Science and Engineering
来源
The VLDB Journal | 2020年 / 29卷
关键词
Diversity; Ptolemy’s spatial diversity; Keyword search; Spatial RDF data; Ranking;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The abundance and ubiquity of RDF data (such as DBpedia and YAGO2) necessitate their effective and efficient retrieval. For this purpose, keyword search paradigms liberate users from understanding the RDF schema and the SPARQL query language. Popular RDF knowledge bases (e.g., YAGO2) also include spatial semantics that enable location-based search. In an earlier location-based keyword search paradigm, the user inputs a set of keywords, a query location, and a number of RDF spatial entities to be retrieved. The output entities should be geographically close to the query location and relevant to the query keywords. However, the results can be similar to each other, compromising query effectiveness. In view of this limitation, we integrate textual and spatial diversification into RDF spatial keyword search, facilitating the retrieval of entities with diverse characteristics and directions with respect to the query location. Since finding the optimal set of query results is NP-hard, we propose two approximate algorithms with guaranteed quality. Extensive empirical studies on two real datasets show that the algorithms only add insignificant overhead compared to non-diversified search, while returning results of high quality in practice (which is verified by a user evaluation study we conducted).
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1189
页数:18
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Adomavicius G(2012)Improving aggregate recommendation diversity using ranking-based techniques IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 24 896-911
[2]  
Kwon Y(2012)Enabling the geospatial semantic web with parliament and geosparql Semant. Web 3 355-370
[3]  
Battle R(2016)Combining user and database perspective for solving keyword queries over relational databases Inf. Syst. 55 1-19
[4]  
Kolas D(2015)Top-k-size keyword search on tree structured data Inf. Syst. 47 178-193
[5]  
Bergamaschi S(2011)A novel keyword search paradigm in relational databases: object summaries DKE 70 208-229
[6]  
Guerra F(2018)Thematic ranking of object summaries for keyword search Data Knowl. Eng. 113 1-17
[7]  
Interlandi M(2011)Size- PVLDB 5 229-240
[8]  
Lado RT(2014) object summaries for relational keyword search IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 26 1026-1038
[9]  
Velegrakis Y(2016)Versatile size- VLDBJ 25 791-816
[10]  
Dimitriou A(2011) object summaries for relational keyword search JIKM 10 193-208