The medical research council’s approach to allegations of scientific misconduct

被引:0
作者
Imogen Evans
机构
[1] Medical Research Council,
来源
Science and Engineering Ethics | 2000年 / 6卷
关键词
Scientific misconduct; fabrication; falsification; plagiarism; deception;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The UK’s Medical Research Council (MRC) introduced a specific policy and procedure for inquiring into allegations of scientific misconduct in December 1997; previously cases had been considered under normal disciplinary procedures. The policy formally covers staff employed in MRC units, but those in receipt of MRC grants in universities and elsewhere are expected to operate under similar policies. The MRC’s approach is stepwise: preliminary action; assessment to establish prima facie evidence of misconduct; formal investigation; sanctions; and appeal. Strict time limits apply at all stages. The procedure will be evaluated after two years. The indications so far are that the procedure is robust, and its clarity and transparency have been an asset to all parties. The MRC is also convinced that it is equally important to achieve a working culture that fosters integrity. Thus education and training in good research practices are fundamental to the prevention of research misconduct.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 94
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   The history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond [J].
Pascal, CB .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 1999, 5 (02) :183-198
[32]   The history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond [J].
Chris B. Pascal .
Science and Engineering Ethics, 1999, 5 :183-198
[33]   Historical Model for Editor and Office of Research Integrity Cooperation in Handling Allegations, Investigation, and Retraction in a Contentious (Abbs) Case of Research Misconduct [J].
Price, Alan R. ;
Daroff, Robert B. .
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2015, 22 (02) :63-80
[34]   Requirements Analysis of System for Research Data Management to Prevent Scientific Misconduct [J].
Funamori, Miho ;
Hayashi, Masaharu ;
Komiyama, Yusuke ;
Tsuchiya, Masatoshi ;
Yamaji, Kazutsuna .
2018 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ADVANCED APPLIED INFORMATICS (IIAI-AAI 2018), 2018, :382-389
[35]   Plagiarism in medical scientific research [J].
Mohammed, Rabab A. A. ;
Shaaban, Omar M. ;
Mahran, Dalia G. ;
Attellawy, Hamdi N. ;
Makhlof, Ahmed ;
Albasri, Abdulkader .
JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 10 (01) :6-11
[36]   Effect of medical researchers' creative performance on scientific misconduct: a moral psychology perspective [J].
Zhang, Na ;
Guo, Mingxuan ;
Jin, Chunhua ;
Xu, Zhen .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2022, 23 (01)
[37]   Knowledge of Scientific Misconduct in Publication among Medical Students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [J].
Alghamdi, Bassam ;
Alomair, Abdulrahman ;
Alsultan, Abdullah ;
Albuthi, Saud ;
Alrashed, Meshal ;
Omair, Aamir .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2019, 8 (01) :63-69
[38]   Investigating and preventing scientific misconduct using Benford's Law [J].
Eckhartt, Gregory M. ;
Ruxton, Graeme D. .
RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW, 2023, 8 (01)
[39]   Effect of medical researchers’ creative performance on scientific misconduct: a moral psychology perspective [J].
Na Zhang ;
Mingxuan Guo ;
Chunhua Jin ;
Zhen Xu .
BMC Medical Ethics, 23
[40]   Investigating and preventing scientific misconduct using Benford’s Law [J].
Gregory M. Eckhartt ;
Graeme D. Ruxton .
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 8