The medical research council’s approach to allegations of scientific misconduct

被引:0
作者
Imogen Evans
机构
[1] Medical Research Council,
来源
Science and Engineering Ethics | 2000年 / 6卷
关键词
Scientific misconduct; fabrication; falsification; plagiarism; deception;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The UK’s Medical Research Council (MRC) introduced a specific policy and procedure for inquiring into allegations of scientific misconduct in December 1997; previously cases had been considered under normal disciplinary procedures. The policy formally covers staff employed in MRC units, but those in receipt of MRC grants in universities and elsewhere are expected to operate under similar policies. The MRC’s approach is stepwise: preliminary action; assessment to establish prima facie evidence of misconduct; formal investigation; sanctions; and appeal. Strict time limits apply at all stages. The procedure will be evaluated after two years. The indications so far are that the procedure is robust, and its clarity and transparency have been an asset to all parties. The MRC is also convinced that it is equally important to achieve a working culture that fosters integrity. Thus education and training in good research practices are fundamental to the prevention of research misconduct.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 94
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Scientific misconduct and research ethics in economics: an introduction [J].
Yalcintas, Altug ;
Wible, James R. .
REVIEW OF SOCIAL ECONOMY, 2016, 74 (01) :1-6
[22]   Fraud and Misconduct in Publishing Medical Research [J].
Elsayed, Dya Eldin M. .
SUDAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 15 (02) :131-141
[23]   Socio-Legal Perspective on Academic, Research and Scientific Misconduct in India [J].
Munigal, Achala ;
Rani, B. Radhika .
IEEE 5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMERGING TRENDS AND TECHNOLOGIES IN LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION SERVICES (ETTLIS 2018), 2018, :319-321
[24]   Evaluating US Medical Schools' Efforts to Educate Faculty Researchers on Research Integrity and Research Misconduct Policies and Procedures [J].
Titus, Sandra Larsen .
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2014, 21 (01) :9-+
[25]   Street research market: dealing with scientific misconduct in Iran [J].
Sadeghi-Bazargani, Homayoun ;
Nikniaz, Leila ;
Nodeh, Hamid Reza Yousefi .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2020, 21 (01)
[26]   Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research [J].
Paruzel-Czachura, Mariola ;
Baran, Lidia ;
Spendel, Zbigniew .
RESEARCH ETHICS, 2021, 17 (03) :375-397
[27]   Street research market: dealing with scientific misconduct in Iran [J].
Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani ;
Leila Nikniaz ;
Hamid Reza Yousefi Nodeh .
BMC Medical Ethics, 21
[28]   FRAUD AND MISCONDUCT IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH: A DEFINITION AND PROCEDURES FOR INVESTIGATION [J].
Catano, Victor M. ;
Turk, James .
MEDICINE AND LAW, 2007, 26 (03) :465-476
[29]   Retractions by Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences due to Scientific Misconduct [J].
Jawaid, Shaukat Ali ;
Jawaid, Masood .
JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2016, 26 (08) :718-719
[30]   The Journal of Pathology's approach to publication ethics and misconduct [J].
Hall, Peter A. ;
Wixon, Jo ;
Poulsom, Richard .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2011, 223 (04) :447-449