The medical research council’s approach to allegations of scientific misconduct

被引:0
|
作者
Imogen Evans
机构
[1] Medical Research Council,
来源
Science and Engineering Ethics | 2000年 / 6卷
关键词
Scientific misconduct; fabrication; falsification; plagiarism; deception;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The UK’s Medical Research Council (MRC) introduced a specific policy and procedure for inquiring into allegations of scientific misconduct in December 1997; previously cases had been considered under normal disciplinary procedures. The policy formally covers staff employed in MRC units, but those in receipt of MRC grants in universities and elsewhere are expected to operate under similar policies. The MRC’s approach is stepwise: preliminary action; assessment to establish prima facie evidence of misconduct; formal investigation; sanctions; and appeal. Strict time limits apply at all stages. The procedure will be evaluated after two years. The indications so far are that the procedure is robust, and its clarity and transparency have been an asset to all parties. The MRC is also convinced that it is equally important to achieve a working culture that fosters integrity. Thus education and training in good research practices are fundamental to the prevention of research misconduct.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 94
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Medical Research Council's approach to allegations of scientific misconduct
    Evans, I
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2000, 6 (01) : 91 - 94
  • [2] The Swedish Research Council’s Definition of ‘Scientific Misconduct’: A Critique
    Håkan Salwén
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2015, 21 : 115 - 126
  • [3] The Swedish Research Council's Definition of 'Scientific Misconduct': A Critique
    Salwen, Hakan
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2015, 21 (01) : 115 - 126
  • [4] Responding to allegations of scientific misconduct: The procedure at the French National Medical and Health-Research Institute
    Breittmayer, JP
    Bungener, M
    De The, H
    Eschwege, E
    Fougereau, M
    Guedj, G
    Kordon, C
    Philippe, O
    Postel-Vinay, MC
    Schaffar-Esterle, L
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2000, 6 (01) : 41 - 48
  • [5] False allegations of research misconduct
    Hansson, Sven Ove
    THEORIA-A SWEDISH JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2024, 90 (06): : 561 - 566
  • [6] A review of the types of scientific misconduct in biomedical research
    Kumar M.N.
    Journal of Academic Ethics, 2008, 6 (3) : 211 - 228
  • [7] Scientific misconduct: A major threat for medical research
    Barde, F.
    Peiffer-Smadja, N.
    de La Blanchardiere, A.
    REVUE DE MEDECINE INTERNE, 2020, 41 (05): : 330 - 334
  • [8] SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT AND BREACH OF PUBLICATION ETHICS: ONE EDITOR'S EXPERIENCE
    Daroff, Robert B.
    MEDICINE AND LAW, 2007, 26 (03): : 527 - 533
  • [9] Computer augmented research and scientific misconduct
    Coy, W
    HUMAN CHOICE AND COMPUTERS: ISSUES OF CHOICE AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2002, 98 : 131 - 146
  • [10] Seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct
    Michael C. Loui
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2002, 8 : 529 - 539