Using proprioception to control ongoing actions: dominance of vision or altered proprioceptive weighing?

被引:0
作者
Rachel Goodman
Luc Tremblay
机构
[1] University of Toronto,Perceptual Motor Behaviour Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Centre for Motor Control
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2018年 / 236卷
关键词
Visual; Somatosensory; Online control; Tendon vibration; Reaching; Motor control;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Visual feedback is crucial for movement accuracy (e.g., Keele and Posner, J Exp Psychol 77:155–158, 1968). As well, proprioception has been argued to be important for the control of voluntary movements (e.g., Bagesteiro et al., Exp Brain Res 171:358–370, 2006; Rossetti et al., J Neurophysiol 74:457–463, 1995). While tendon vibration (TVib) has been used to perturb proprioceptive information during limb matching tasks (Goodwin et al., Science 175:1382–1384, 1972), the current study employed between-trial dual-muscle TVib, coupled with vision occlusion, to assess the use of vision and proprioception for the online control of voluntary movements. Participants (n = 17) performed an upper-limb reaching task (30 cm). TVib influenced both accuracy and precision of movement endpoint. Critically, variability analyses showed that participant’s performance was most affected by TVib at 75% of the movement duration, even in the presence of vision. These findings demonstrate that between-trial dual-muscle tendon vibration can perturb proprioceptive feedback, and further, suggest that proprioception can be important for the online control of reaches, even when vision is available.
引用
收藏
页码:1897 / 1910
页数:13
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]  
Adams JA(1972)Response feedback and motor learning J Exp Psychol 92 391-397
[2]  
Goetz ET(2006)Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance Exp Brain Res 171 358-370
[3]  
Marshall PH(2007)Evidence for distinct, differentially adaptable sensorimotor transformations for reaches to visual and proprioceptive targets J Neurophysiol 98 1815-1819
[4]  
Bagesteiro LB(2015)Target modality affects visually guided online control of reaching Vis Res 110 233-243
[5]  
Sarlegna FR(1981)The effects of muscle vibration on the attainment of intended final position during voluntary human arm movements Exp Brain Res 42 228-230
[6]  
Sainburg RL(1981)Visual information: the control of aiming movements Q J Exp Psychol Sect A 33 87-93
[7]  
Bernier PM(1995)Proprioceptive consequences of tendon vibration during movement J Neurophysiol 74 1675-1688
[8]  
Gauthier GM(1966)Normal variability of tonic vibration reflexes in man Exp Neurol 16 80-92
[9]  
Blouin J(1991)Discrete vs. continuous visual control of manual aiming Hum Mov Sci 10 393-418
[10]  
Cameron BD(2001)A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming Psychol Bull 127 342-357