Adenoma detection at colonoscopy by polypectomy in withdrawal only versus both insertion and withdrawal: a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Madhusudhan R. Sanaka
Mansour A. Parsi
Carol A. Burke
David Barnes
James Church
Maged Rizk
Nizar Zein
Rajesh Joseph
Prashanthi N. Thota
Rocio Lopez
Ravi P. Kiran
机构
[1] Cleveland Clinic,Departments of Gastroenterology, Desk Q3
[2] Cleveland Clinic,1
[3] Cleveland Clinic,Colorectal Surgery
来源
Surgical Endoscopy | 2015年 / 29卷
关键词
Colonoscopy; Adenoma detection rate; Adenomas; Colon polyps; Insertion time; Withdrawal time;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Colonic configuration during insertion phase (IP) and withdrawal phase (WP) is different and some polyps seen during IP are difficult to find during WP and vice versa. To determine if polypectomy performed during both IP and WP of colonoscopy (study arm) increases adenoma detection rate (ADR) compared to WP only (control arm). In this prospective randomized controlled trial, adults undergoing out-patient colonoscopy were enrolled. The primary outcome was mean number of adenomas detected per patient. Secondary outcomes were ADR, defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with at least one adenoma, polyp detection rates (PDR), number of patients classified as high-risk group (presence of ≥3 adenomas of any size, any adenoma ≥1 cm in size, or adenoma with villous component, or high grade dysplasia), procedural times, patients discomfort, and ease of procedure. Among 772 patients enrolled, 610 were included (329 in study arm and 281 in control arm). In both arms, mean number of adenomas detected per patient were similar, 0.78 ± 1.4 vs. 0.74 ± 1.5, P = 0.75. Also, ADR (39.2 vs. 38.1 %, P = 0.77) and PDR (57.1 and 54.1 %, P = 0.45) were similar. Mean insertion time was significantly higher in study arm (10.2 ± 5.8 vs. 9.3 ± 5.6 min, p = 0.046). Proportion of patients identified as high-risk group were significantly higher in study arm (18.8 vs. 11.7 %, P = 0.016). Conclusions: Polypectomy performed during both IP and WP compared to the WP only, did not improve ADR or mean number of adenomas detected per patient. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, #NCT01025960.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 699
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of the No Interruption Zone on Distraction Levels, Withdrawal Times, and Adenoma Detection Rates of Colonoscopy
    Behazin, Nancy S.
    Thompson, Michelle
    Milad, Mena
    Hart, Jeffrey
    Song, Juhee
    Jeffries, Mark
    Sears, Dawn M.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2015, 60 (04) : 966 - 970
  • [32] Prolonged Cecal Insertion Time Is Not Associated with Decreased Adenoma Detection When a Longer Withdrawal Time Is Achieved
    Fritz, Cassandra D. L.
    Smith, Zachary L.
    Elsner, Jeffrey
    Hollander, Thomas
    Early, Dayna
    Kushnir, Vladimir
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2018, 63 (11) : 3120 - 3125
  • [33] Reduced adenoma miss rate with 9-min vs 6-min withdrawal times for screening colonoscopy: A multicenter randomized tandem trial
    Zhao, Shengbing
    Song, Yihang
    Li, Zhaoshen
    Bai, Yu
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 : 14 - 14
  • [34] Reduced adenoma miss rate with 9-min vs 6-min withdrawal times for screening colonoscopy: A multicenter randomized tandem trial
    Zhao, Shengbing
    Song, Yihang
    Li, Zhaoshen
    Bai, Yu
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 : 14 - 14
  • [35] Impact of second forward-view examination on adenoma detection rate during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Keshu Shan
    Hongpeng Lu
    Zhixin Zhang
    Jiarong Xie
    Lu Xu
    Weihong Wang
    Chunjiu Hu
    Lei Xu
    BMC Gastroenterology, 21
  • [36] Randomized controlled trial of EndoRings assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy
    Thayalasekaran, Sreedhari
    Bhattacharyya, Rupam
    Chedgy, Fergus
    Basford, Peter
    Subramaniam, Sharmila
    Kandiah, Kesavan
    Thursby-Pelham, Fergus
    Brown, James
    Alkandari, Asma
    Ellis, Richard
    Coda, Sergio
    Goggin, Patrick
    Amos, Mark
    Fogg, Carole
    Longcroft-Wheaton, Gaius
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 35 (03) : 354 - 360
  • [37] Impact of second forward-view examination on adenoma detection rate during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Shan, Keshu
    Lu, Hongpeng
    Zhang, Zhixin
    Xie, Jiarong
    Xu, Lu
    Wang, Weihong
    Hu, Chunjiu
    Xu, Lei
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [38] Impact of a ring-fitted cap on insertion time and adenoma detection: a randomized controlled trial
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Kessler, William R.
    Sagi, Sashidhar, V
    Rogers, Nicholas A.
    Fischer, Monika
    Bohm, Matthew E.
    Wo, John M.
    Dewitt, John M.
    McHenry, Lee
    Lahr, Rachel E.
    Searight, Meghan P.
    MacPhail, Margaret
    Sullivan, Andrew W.
    McWhinney, Connor D.
    Vemulapalli, Krishna C.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (01) : 115 - 120
  • [39] Artificial Intelligence for Adenoma and Polyp Detection During Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Randomized-Controlled Trial
    Alali, Ali A.
    Alhashmi, Ahmad
    Alotaibi, Nawal
    Ali, Nargess
    Alali, Maryam
    Alfadhli, Ahmad
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (02)
  • [40] Optimized computer-assisted technique for increasing adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Djinbachian, Roupen
    Taghiakbari, Mahsa
    Barkun, Alan
    Medawar, Edgard
    Alj, Abla
    Sidani, Sacha
    Kiow, Jeremy Liu Chen
    Panzini, Benoit
    Bouin, Mickael
    Lasfar, Dina
    von Renteln, Daniel
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2025, 39 (02): : 1120 - 1127