Adenoma detection at colonoscopy by polypectomy in withdrawal only versus both insertion and withdrawal: a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Madhusudhan R. Sanaka
Mansour A. Parsi
Carol A. Burke
David Barnes
James Church
Maged Rizk
Nizar Zein
Rajesh Joseph
Prashanthi N. Thota
Rocio Lopez
Ravi P. Kiran
机构
[1] Cleveland Clinic,Departments of Gastroenterology, Desk Q3
[2] Cleveland Clinic,1
[3] Cleveland Clinic,Colorectal Surgery
来源
Surgical Endoscopy | 2015年 / 29卷
关键词
Colonoscopy; Adenoma detection rate; Adenomas; Colon polyps; Insertion time; Withdrawal time;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Colonic configuration during insertion phase (IP) and withdrawal phase (WP) is different and some polyps seen during IP are difficult to find during WP and vice versa. To determine if polypectomy performed during both IP and WP of colonoscopy (study arm) increases adenoma detection rate (ADR) compared to WP only (control arm). In this prospective randomized controlled trial, adults undergoing out-patient colonoscopy were enrolled. The primary outcome was mean number of adenomas detected per patient. Secondary outcomes were ADR, defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with at least one adenoma, polyp detection rates (PDR), number of patients classified as high-risk group (presence of ≥3 adenomas of any size, any adenoma ≥1 cm in size, or adenoma with villous component, or high grade dysplasia), procedural times, patients discomfort, and ease of procedure. Among 772 patients enrolled, 610 were included (329 in study arm and 281 in control arm). In both arms, mean number of adenomas detected per patient were similar, 0.78 ± 1.4 vs. 0.74 ± 1.5, P = 0.75. Also, ADR (39.2 vs. 38.1 %, P = 0.77) and PDR (57.1 and 54.1 %, P = 0.45) were similar. Mean insertion time was significantly higher in study arm (10.2 ± 5.8 vs. 9.3 ± 5.6 min, p = 0.046). Proportion of patients identified as high-risk group were significantly higher in study arm (18.8 vs. 11.7 %, P = 0.016). Conclusions: Polypectomy performed during both IP and WP compared to the WP only, did not improve ADR or mean number of adenomas detected per patient. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, #NCT01025960.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 699
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Linked color imaging versus white light imaging colonoscopy for colorectal adenoma detection: A randomized controlled trial
    Miyaguchi, Kazuya
    Takabayashi, Kaoru
    Saito, Daisuke
    Tsuzuki, Yoshikazu
    Hirooka, Nobutaka
    Hosoe, Naoki
    Ohgo, Hideki
    Ashitani, Keigo
    Soma, Hiromitsu
    Miyanaga, Ryoichi
    Kimura, Kayoko
    Tokunaga, Sotaro
    Mitsui, Tatsuya
    Miura, Miki
    Ozaki, Ryo
    Nakamoto, Hidetomo
    Kanai, Takanori
    Hisamatsu, Tadakazu
    Ogata, Haruhiko
    Imaeda, Hiroyuki
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 (10) : 2778 - 2784
  • [22] Standard versus Endocuff versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: A randomised controlled clinical trial
    Floer, Martin
    Tschaikowski, Laura
    Schepke, Michael
    Kempinski, Radoslaw
    Neubauer, Katarzyna
    Poniewierka, Elzbieta
    Kunsch, Steffen
    Ameis, Detlev
    Heinzow, Hauke Sebastian
    Auer, Agneta
    Schmidt, Hartmut H.
    Ellenrieder, Volker
    Meister, Tobias
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 9 (04) : 443 - 450
  • [23] Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques
    Eduardo Coghlan
    Luis Laferrere
    Elisa Zenon
    Juan Manuel Marini
    German Rainero
    Alberto San Roman
    Maria Lourdes Posadas Martinez
    Angel Nadales
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 1200 - 1205
  • [24] Randomized control trial of adenoma detection rate in Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus transparent hood-assisted colonoscopy
    Imaeda, Hiroyuki
    Yamaoka, Minoru
    Ohgo, Hideki
    Soma, Hiromitsu
    Ashitani, Keigo
    Miyaguchi, Kazuya
    Tsuzuki, Yoshikazu
    Hosoe, Naoki
    Nakamoto, Hidetomo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 34 (09) : 1492 - 1496
  • [25] Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques
    Coghlan, Eduardo
    Laferrere, Luis
    Zenon, Elisa
    Manuel Marini, Juan
    Rainero, German
    San Roman, Alberto
    Posadas Martinez, Maria Lourdes
    Nadales, Angel
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (03): : 1200 - 1205
  • [26] Detection Measures for Colonoscopy Considerations On the Adenoma Detection Rate, Recommended Detection Thresholds, Withdrawal Times, and Potential Updates to Measures
    Rex, Douglas K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 54 (02) : 130 - 135
  • [27] Endo-wing versus transparent hood-assisted colonoscopy for colorectal adenoma detection: A randomized controlled trial
    Miyaguchi, Kazuya
    Tsuzuki, Yoshikazu
    Hirooka, Nobutaka
    Shiomi, Rie
    Ohgo, Hideki
    Nakamoto, Hidetomo
    Imaeda, Hiroyuki
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 37 (04) : 766 - 772
  • [28] Effects of the No Interruption Zone on Distraction Levels, Withdrawal Times, and Adenoma Detection Rates of Colonoscopy
    Nancy S. Behazin
    Michelle Thompson
    Mena Milad
    Jeffrey Hart
    Juhee Song
    Mark Jeffries
    Dawn M. Sears
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2015, 60 : 966 - 970
  • [29] Trainees' adenoma detection rate is higher if ≥10 minutes is spent on withdrawal during colonoscopy
    Gromski, Mark A.
    Miller, Christopher A.
    Lee, Suck-Ho
    Park, Eun Seo
    Lee, Tae Hoon
    Park, Sang-Heum
    Chung, Il-Kwun
    Kim, Sun-Joo
    Hwangbo, Young
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (05): : 1337 - 1342
  • [30] Trainees’ adenoma detection rate is higher if ≥10 minutes is spent on withdrawal during colonoscopy
    Mark A. Gromski
    Christopher A. Miller
    Suck-Ho Lee
    Eun Seo Park
    Tae Hoon Lee
    Sang-Heum Park
    Il-Kwun Chung
    Sun-Joo Kim
    Young Hwangbo
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 1337 - 1342